Home » Location

Location
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Anne Arundel County / Circuit Court / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Institutions / Maryland / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files

The Wrong County

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A Maryland custody case involving Sarah Hornbeck and Jeffrey Reichert experienced prolonged legal battles due to a contentious address issue. Hornbeck’s initial emergency petition, filed under an incorrect Anne Arundel County address, led to years of hearings and appeals. Despite numerous jurisdiction challenges, the court upheld jurisdiction without addressing the misrepresentation of Hornbeck’s residence.

The Wrong County Read More
California / Congress / Congress / Democrats / democrats / Government / Government / Government Accountability / Government Ethics & Accountability / Institutions & Accountability / Politics / Swalwell Series

The Open Secret

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

For years, it was an open secret in Washington. The real story isn’t just what happened — it’s what Congress chose to keep hidden.

The Open Secret Read More
2 - Analysis / California / Campaigns / Congress / Congress / Corruption / Dead Reckoning / Democrats / democrats / Elections / Government / Government Ethics & Accountability / Government Watch / Politics / Politics / Politics & Power / Swalwell Series

After Swalwell: The Confluence

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Swalwell situation in California exemplifies the intersection of political accountability and electoral strategy. While serious allegations against him prompted a swift Democratic response, the urgency was fueled by the state’s top-two primary system, threatening the party’s viability. Swalwell’s removal may consolidate Democratic support, reshaping the gubernatorial race.

After Swalwell: The Confluence Read More
2 - Analysis / California / Congress / Congress / Government / Government / Government Accountability / Government Ethics & Accountability / Government Watch / Institutions & Accountability / Politics / Swalwell Series

The 24-Hour Demolition

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

A rising political career didn’t unravel over months — it collapsed in a single weekend. This analysis examines how power, pressure, and party machinery moved with unusual speed.

The 24-Hour Demolition Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Trafficking / Child Welfare / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Institutions / Legal Reform / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Series / The Reichert Files / The Shadow Docket of Reichert v. Hornbeck

The 90-Day Order: How an Unprecedented Custody Decision Became Invisible Law

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In February 2022, Judge Alison L. Asti ordered Jeffrey Reichert to have no contact with his son, G.R., for ninety days, disrupting their long-established custody. The unreported appellate opinion overlooked crucial case history, raising concerns about judicial consistency and transparency in contested custody cases involving allegations of parental alienation.

The 90-Day Order: How an Unprecedented Custody Decision Became Invisible Law Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Anne Arundel County / Appellate Court / Baltimore City / Baltimore County / Civil Rights / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Domestic Violence / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Legal Reform / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Protective Orders / The Reichert Files / The Shadow Docket of Reichert v. Hornbeck

The Standard Nobody Published: Maryland’s Amended Protective Order Law, Eight Years Without a Reported Case

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A Maryland custody case once made law. Then, over six years and five more appeals, Reichert v. Hornbeck generated a body of unreported family-law rulings that resolved recurring questions but never entered the state’s published precedent. This article examines what that means for litigants, lawyers, and the public.
Grounded in the article’s opening and its explanation of the five unreported opinions and their impact.

The Standard Nobody Published: Maryland’s Amended Protective Order Law, Eight Years Without a Reported Case Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Anne Arundel County / Baltimore City / Baltimore County / Court Corruption / Family Court Reform / Institutions / Legal Reform / Maryland / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files / The Shadow Docket of Reichert v. Hornbeck / Virginia

Five Appeals, No Precedent: How One of Maryland’s Most Litigated Custody Cases Disappeared Into the Shadows

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In 2013, the Maryland custody case Reichert v. Hornbeck set legal precedents but generated five unreported opinions that became invisible in family law discussions. These opinions addressed crucial issues like protective orders and child support yet lacked publication, highlighting systemic transparency problems in Maryland’s family law, affecting future cases significantly.

Five Appeals, No Precedent: How One of Maryland’s Most Litigated Custody Cases Disappeared Into the Shadows Read More
2 - Analysis / Law Enforcement / Maryland / Public Safety

When Police Kill Disabled Americans, No One Has to Count It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Disabled Americans are killed by police at disproportionately high rates — but no official system tracks it. The data exists only through journalists and advocates, exposing a national accountability gap hiding in plain sight.

When Police Kill Disabled Americans, No One Has to Count It Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Court Corruption / Family Court Reform / Institutions / The California Custody Cartel

Inside the California Custody Cartel

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Brenna Gano’s experience in California’s family court highlights a troubling system where justice is influenced by financial interests. Misled and pressured into signing agreements, she faced excessive costs and neurological biases that labeled her as unstable. Her case exemplifies a broader pattern of exploitation for profit within family court practices, jeopardizing families’ well-being.

Inside the California Custody Cartel Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / California / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Institutions

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The article highlights the risks parents face in private judging during family court proceedings, often unaware of its binding nature. Many experience significant pressure and confusion, leading to irreversible agreements without fully understanding the consequences. It emphasizes the need for clarity and proper legal guidance before consenting to such processes.

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom Read More