Tag: family court injustice

Constitutional Law / Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / South Carolina / Supreme Court

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

William Sewell, a South Carolina father, faces potential incarceration over unpaid child support and a hefty guardian ad litem fee. His case raises due process concerns, particularly regarding the right to legal counsel as outlined in Turner v. Rogers. This situation highlights systemic injustices towards indigent parents in family courts across the U.S.

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case Read More
Advocacy / Civil Rights / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court

Stories Into Storms: How Digital Advocacy is the Key to Fixing America’s Family Courts

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The author shares their harrowing experience in the American family court system, highlighting its failings and the toll it took on their life. They emphasize the importance of digital advocacy, as individuals unite to expose systemic abuse. By sharing stories, they aim to demand accountability, challenge court secrecy, and push for reform.

Stories Into Storms: How Digital Advocacy is the Key to Fixing America’s Family Courts Read More
Court Reform / Family Court / Judges / New York / The Fishman Files

Aidan Hasn’t Seen His Father in 7 Years: When Parental Alienation Is Court-Sanctioned

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Marc Fishman has not seen his son Aidan for over seven years, despite no allegations of abuse or danger. Fishman’s case highlights failures in the family court system, where parental alienation is overlooked and visitation rights are denied without due process. This tragedy reflects a broader issue affecting many parents and children.

Aidan Hasn’t Seen His Father in 7 Years: When Parental Alienation Is Court-Sanctioned Read More
Anne Arundel County / Appellate Court / Baltimore County / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Family Court / Judges / The Reichert Files

The Case Maryland Wants to Bury: Inside Reichert v. Hornbeck

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

The Reichert v. Hornbeck case details a father’s arduous battle for custody over his son, marked by systemic biases and legal obstacles. Jeff Reichert’s parental rights were revoked without appropriate justification, exacerbated by the Maryland judiciary’s refusal to publicly document critical rulings. This case highlights alarming issues within family law and judicial transparency.

The Case Maryland Wants to Bury: Inside Reichert v. Hornbeck Read More
Constitutional Law / Corruption / Court Reform / Judges / Judicial / Uncategorized

“The Constitution Doesn’t Apply Here”: The Most Dangerous Lie in America’s Courtrooms

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

A New Jersey family court judge’s statement that “The Constitution doesn’t apply in my courtroom” reflects a broader issue in courts nationwide, especially in family law. The article argues that constitutional rights must be upheld across all judicial actions, insisting on accountability and condemning judicial tyranny in family courts where parental rights are violated.

“The Constitution Doesn’t Apply Here”: The Most Dangerous Lie in America’s Courtrooms Read More
Family Court / Judicial

Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family court often prioritizes wealth over justice, creating socioeconomic bias against those who cannot afford legal representation or services. This leads to systemic disadvantages for low-income litigants, impacting their ability to advocate for their children’s best interests. Strategies exist for pro se litigants to combat these inequalities and seek fair treatment.

Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court Read More
Constitutional Law / Family Court / Judicial / Montgomery County / Supreme Court

The Constitution Is Not a Vibe: How Parham v. J.R. and Other Landmark Cases Expose the Lie at the Heart of Mahmoud v. Taylor

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Mahmoud v. Taylor highlights a troubling trend in American family courts where fit parents’ rights are overridden based on vague “best interest” claims without proof of unfitness or harm. This undermines due process, as courts increasingly disregard constitutional protections for parental rights, leading to unjust custody decisions. Immediate reform is necessary.

The Constitution Is Not a Vibe: How Parham v. J.R. and Other Landmark Cases Expose the Lie at the Heart of Mahmoud v. Taylor Read More
bias / Family Court / Judicial / Misconduct / Uncategorized

⚖️ Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family court often exhibits socioeconomic bias, favoring wealthier litigants and undermining those without financial resources. This bias can lead to dire consequences for lower-income parents, affecting their ability to secure fair hearings and maintain relationships with their children. Advocating for equal treatment and reform in the judiciary is crucial for justice.

⚖️ Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court Read More
Circuit Court / Family Court / Judicial

When the System Rewards Destruction

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The author’s experience in Maryland Family Court from 2020 to 2022 highlights the destructive impact of attorney Alisa G. Cummins, who weaponized family conflict and mental health issues to undermine the author’s life. Despite his innocence, he suffered significant losses, including his home and his relationship with his son, exposing a flawed system that rewards manipulation.

When the System Rewards Destruction Read More
Advocacy / Family Court / Judicial / Misconduct / Overreach

The Gender Wars Are a Distraction: How the Family Court System Profits from Division While Parents and Children Lose Everything

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system in America is characterized by dysfunction and profit-driven practices that alienate parents from their children, framing the conflict as a “gender war.” Both mothers and fathers face systemic obstacles, leading to a multi-billion-dollar industry that thrives on conflict. Uniting against this system is crucial for reform and healing.

The Gender Wars Are a Distraction: How the Family Court System Profits from Division While Parents and Children Lose Everything Read More