Home » Series » Page 8

Maryland Democrats Are Contesting Every Seat. Will the GOP Even Show Up?

The Maryland Democratic Party, led by Chair Steuart Pittman and Governor Wes Moore, is launching a “Contest Every Seat” campaign for the 2026 elections, aiming to field candidates statewide. Meanwhile, Maryland Republicans are struggling to form a cohesive strategy, risking continued political marginalization amidst Democratic dominance and precision gerrymandering.

Maryland Democrats Are Contesting Every Seat. Will the GOP Even Show Up? Read More

A Department in Decay: How Prince George’s County Police Became a Case Study in Institutional Failure

Prince George’s County’s police department sits at the uneasy intersection of race, power, and accountability — a majority-Black force in a majority-Black county still haunted by decades of corruption and cover-ups. From the $20 million William Green shooting settlement to this month’s $2.35 million verdict for whistleblower Mohamed Magassouba, the pattern is clear: misconduct isn’t the exception, it’s the expense of doing business. “A Department in Decay” traces how internal retaliation, political favoritism, and taxpayer-funded damage control have replaced real reform — and why even honest cops are paying the price.

A Department in Decay: How Prince George’s County Police Became a Case Study in Institutional Failure Read More

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center

The article by Michael Phillips argues that family courts and child welfare systems have evolved into profit-driven industries, prioritizing revenue over family stability. Federal laws like Title IV-D and Title IV-E incentivize conflict and child removal, creating a cycle of dependency and trauma for families. Reform is essential to shift these damaging incentives.

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center Read More

Frederick’s Fork in the Road: O’Connor’s Progressive Agenda Meets a Conservative County

With less than a month until the election, Frederick Mayor Michael O’Connor faces criticism over his record, described as out of touch and too progressive. Controversial policies include taxpayer-funded legal aid for non-citizens and a vetoed budget favoring his agenda. Voters must decide between progressive politics or practical governance on November 4.

Frederick’s Fork in the Road: O’Connor’s Progressive Agenda Meets a Conservative County Read More

Maryland’s Election Data Standoff: Privacy, Politics, or Plain Stonewalling?

The U.S. DOJ requested Maryland’s voter-roll data for election integrity checks, leading to a rejection by state officials citing privacy and state sovereignty. This refusal reflects political bias, as Maryland’s Democrats oppose scrutiny from a Republican-led DOJ but embrace similar inquiries from left-leaning administrations. The ongoing tension raises concerns about electoral transparency and accountability.

Maryland’s Election Data Standoff: Privacy, Politics, or Plain Stonewalling? Read More

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today”

During a federal shutdown, a Los Angeles courtroom silenced advocates and observers during a hearing for domestic violence survivor Giselle Smiel, violating her ADA rights. Despite a provided Teams link for remote access, court staff denied participation, raising concerns over public oversight and institutional failure in providing justice and transparency for vulnerable individuals.

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today” Read More

The $190,000 Coffee: How a One-Hour Meeting Exposed Baltimore County’s Culture of Cronyism

A coffee meeting in Towson triggered a costly legal battle in Baltimore County, draining $190,000 in taxpayer funds. Inspector General Kelly Madigan faced attempts to undermine her investigation into a politically connected developer after an alleged intimidation attempt. The scandal highlights Maryland’s troubling trend of protecting political insiders at taxpayers’ expense.

The $190,000 Coffee: How a One-Hour Meeting Exposed Baltimore County’s Culture of Cronyism Read More

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed

The case of Giselle Smiel highlights significant issues of transparency and jurisdictional failures in California’s justice system. After a May 2025 incident involving alleged child abduction, Smiel faced six felony charges despite having no criminal history. Denied access to public records and effective legal representation, she remains in jail, raising concerns over systemic accountability and due process.

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed Read More

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: How Lack of Transparency Jailed a Survivor

Family courts claim to protect children, but secrecy has turned them into weapons against the very parents who seek safety. In California, survivor Giselle Smiel cared for her children alone for five years—only to lose them to an abusive ex after missing one hearing during her son’s medical emergency. Now she sits in jail on six felony charges, without transcripts, without ADA accommodations, and without transparency. Her case proves what advocates like Renata DeMello have long warned: until the public can see inside family court, justice will remain out of reach.

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: How Lack of Transparency Jailed a Survivor Read More

Liz Walsh’s Ugly Disrespect: Glorifying Hate While Mocking Mourning

Howard County Council Chair Liz Walsh turned national mourning into partisan theater. By raising the flag against a presidential order honoring Charlie Kirk—and by cherry-picking his words to smear him even in death—Walsh glorified division and disrespected the families of 9/11 and Kirk alike. Maryland deserves leaders who unite, not activists who mock and politicize tragedy.

Liz Walsh’s Ugly Disrespect: Glorifying Hate While Mocking Mourning Read More