parental rights Archives - Page 3 of 6

Justice in Name Only: Veterans Expose Abuse in Summerville and Dorchester Family Courts

August 28, 2025August 27, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Two South Carolina veterans say they faced not justice, but systematic torture in Summerville and Dorchester family courts. William Sewell and Lee describe the same pattern: crushing fees, intimidation, and jail threats under Judge Mandy Kimmons and attorney Jason Wheeler. What should have been custody hearings became, in their words, an assembly line of punishment and profit. Their stories raise a chilling question: if men who once defended American freedom are now stripped of their own rights in family court, what does that say about the state of justice in South Carolina?

A Generation Raised in the Shadow of Violence: Guns or Family Breakdown?

August 27, 2025August 27, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Another school shooting. This time, two children dead and seventeen others injured in Minneapolis. Politicians are already tweeting the same slogans about “stopping gun violence,” but for over two decades those words have meant nothing. The deeper truth is harder to face: America’s epidemic of mass shootings isn’t just about guns—it’s about the collapse of family, the destruction caused by corrupt family courts, and a political class too invested in power and profit to fix the systems tearing children apart.

California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Trafficking / Constitutional Rights / Family Court / Family Values / Government / Government Corruption / Government Waste / Governor / Immagration / Legislation / parental rights / Public Safety / State Legislators

California’s AB 495: A “Family Preparedness” Plan or a Backdoor Attack on Parental Rights?

August 27, 2025August 26, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

California’s Assembly Bill 495 aims to provide care continuity for children when parents are unavailable but faces criticism for its vague language, which could enable unauthorized adults to make critical decisions for children without oversight. Critics argue it undermines parental rights and poses risks of exploitation, while supporters defend it as necessary for families in crisis.

2026 Elections Cycle / Accountability / Baltimore City / Constitutional Rights / Crime & Violence / Crime Violence / Criminal / Democrats / Due Process Denied / Government / Government / Government Waste / Governor / Maryland / parental rights / Politics

Chris Van Hollen: More Passion for Politics Than His Constituents

August 27, 2025August 27, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Senator Chris Van Hollen is criticized for prioritizing partisan issues over the real challenges faced by Maryland families. His focus on due process is perceived as selective, emphasizing high-profile cases while ignoring local judicial failures. The disparity between his activism for foreign issues and silence on domestic struggles highlights a disconnect with constituents’ needs.

bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Civil Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Discrimination / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Misconduct / parental rights / Poverty / The Corruption Series / Virginia / Virginia Watch

Passport to Nowhere: How Child Support Enforcement Blocks Parents from Working

August 26, 2025August 25, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A Virginia parent faced barriers to employment due to bureaucratic hurdles related to child support enforcement. Despite a job offer contingent on obtaining a passport, an unexpected demand for a $5,000 payment plan arose. This illustrates systemic issues in child support agencies that perpetuate poverty through inflated arrears and lack of due process.

Two Years Without My Son: How Montgomery County Circuit Court Refuses to Enforce Custody Orders

August 24, 2025August 24, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The author laments nearly two years of estrangement from his son due to the Montgomery County Circuit Court’s failure to enforce custody orders. Despite providing evidence of parental interference, judges dismissed his pleas, resulting in instability for the child and alienation for the father. The author calls for systemic reform to ensure accountability.

Seven Ways Montgomery County Circuit Court Enables Custodial Interference

August 24, 2025August 24, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The author describes their experience with Montgomery County Circuit Court, highlighting systemic failures in enforcing custody orders. Key issues include treating violations as disputes, failing to enforce contempt, prioritizing mediation, and ignoring parental alienation. These practices harm both children and parents, necessitating accountability and transparency in family courts to protect children’s rights.

Why Family Court Judges Can Break the Law and Get Away With It

August 22, 2025August 22, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family courts, intended to serve justice, often operate beyond the law, relying on a vague standard of “best interests of the child.” Judges wield unchecked power, enjoying immunity from accountability. Parents face significant disadvantages, lacking essential rights during proceedings. Urgent reforms are needed to ensure fairness and transparency in family law.

Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Child Trafficking / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Family Values / Government / parental rights / Politics

Lost in the Crossfire: Why Family Court Reform Struggles in America’s Political Battlefield

August 21, 2025August 21, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In America, the family court system’s corruption and dysfunction quietly devastate countless families, often ignored amid partisan conflicts. Reform requires transparency, accountability, and oversight, yet political leaders hesitate to act due to concerns over power structures. This crisis affects all sides, demanding urgent attention as it undermines justice and family stability.

Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / Misconduct / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms

Why Do Courts Hate Due Process? And Why It’s So Hard for Family Court Litigants to Obtain

August 20, 2025August 20, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family courts often disregard constitutional due process, prioritizing expediency over fairness. This environment fosters misconduct due to secrecy and lack of oversight. Litigants, usually self-represented, may struggle to assert their rights. To combat this, parents must document objections, use specific legal terminology, file motions, and consider appeals to ensure accountability.

parental rights

Justice in Name Only: Veterans Expose Abuse in Summerville and Dorchester Family Courts

Like this:

A Generation Raised in the Shadow of Violence: Guns or Family Breakdown?

Like this:

California’s AB 495: A “Family Preparedness” Plan or a Backdoor Attack on Parental Rights?

Like this:

Chris Van Hollen: More Passion for Politics Than His Constituents

Like this:

Two Years Without My Son: How Montgomery County Circuit Court Refuses to Enforce Custody Orders

Like this:

Seven Ways Montgomery County Circuit Court Enables Custodial Interference

Like this:

Why Family Court Judges Can Break the Law and Get Away With It

Like this:

Lost in the Crossfire: Why Family Court Reform Struggles in America’s Political Battlefield

Like this:

Why Do Courts Hate Due Process? And Why It’s So Hard for Family Court Litigants to Obtain

Like this:

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman

“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well

No Warrant. No Order. Just Lies. — The San Marcos School Ambush Exposing Family Court Fraud

The Silence of the Brave: How Nancy Schaefer’s Death Unmasked a Web of Government Corruption Beyond CPS

The Shadow Guardian: Who Is John Michel and Why Is He Central to the Reichert v. Hornbeck Custody Crisis?

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: