bias Archives - Page 3 of 4

Two Years Without My Son: How Montgomery County Circuit Court Refuses to Enforce Custody Orders

August 24, 2025August 24, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The author laments nearly two years of estrangement from his son due to the Montgomery County Circuit Court’s failure to enforce custody orders. Despite providing evidence of parental interference, judges dismissed his pleas, resulting in instability for the child and alienation for the father. The author calls for systemic reform to ensure accountability.

Why Family Court Judges Can Break the Law and Get Away With It

August 22, 2025August 22, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family courts, intended to serve justice, often operate beyond the law, relying on a vague standard of “best interests of the child.” Judges wield unchecked power, enjoying immunity from accountability. Parents face significant disadvantages, lacking essential rights during proceedings. Urgent reforms are needed to ensure fairness and transparency in family law.

2026 Elections Cycle / Accountability / bias / Congress / Crime & Violence / democrats / Government / Government / Government Waste / Maryland / Montgomery County / Politics

Jamie Raskin: Professor of Partisanship, Congressman of Chaos

August 20, 2025August 20, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Rep. Jamie Raskin has gained notoriety for his anti-Trump activism rather than addressing local issues affecting Maryland. While he passionately critiques Trump and claims to defend democratic institutions, critics argue he neglects pressing concerns like crime and addiction in his district. His focus on partisan battles leads to questions about his effectiveness as a representative.

Maryland’s Family Courts: Rights on Paper, Injustice in Practice

August 18, 2025August 18, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Maryland’s family court system faces severe criticism for failing to protect children and uphold parental rights. Issues include non-enforcement of court orders, mishandling of abuse allegations, and lack of accountability. Judges exercise unchecked discretion, leading to bias and procedural irregularities, ultimately causing harm to families and children caught in the system.

Accountability / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Divorce / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Misconduct / parental rights

The Family Court System: Where Justice Goes to Die

August 16, 2025August 15, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system is designed to exploit vulnerable parents rather than deliver justice. Many enter with misguided beliefs about fairness, only to face manipulation and financial drain. High-conflict individuals often thrive while innocent parents suffer, resulting in emotional and financial devastation. The system needs abolition and replacement to truly protect children.

“Pay Up or Shut Up”: How South Carolina’s Legal-Political Machine Silences Parents Like William Sewell

August 15, 2025August 15, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

William Sewell’s case in South Carolina highlights systemic failures in family court, revealing a punitive culture against parents exposing corruption. Legislator Gill Gatch’s remarks underscore a corrupt pay-to-play system, where speaking out leads to ostracization while silence necessitates financial submission, ultimately jeopardizing families and perpetuating injustices.

Double Dipping Isn’t Just Maryland’s Problem – The National Pattern of Replacing Parents While Still Charging Support

August 14, 2025August 14, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Maryland, courts permit a “de facto father” to replace the biological parent while still enforcing child support obligations, highlighting a troubling trend in family courts nationwide. This practice benefits states financially, creating a system where parental rights are diminished yet financial obligations persist, often under the guise of the child’s best interests.

Anne Arundel County / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Family Values / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Misconduct / Money and Finance / The Corruption Series / The Reichert Files

Child Support & “Double Dipping” – The Absurd Economics of Erasing a Parent

August 14, 2025August 14, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Reichert v. Hornbeck case highlights the absurdity of Maryland’s family court system, where a biological father is forced to pay child support despite being replaced as a parent without due process. This practice not only undermines the child’s best interests but also serves the economic interests of the court and state.

Anne Arundel County / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Misconduct / parental rights / The Corruption Series / The Reichert Files / transparency

Maryland’s Parent-Erasure Pattern: Dangerous Crossroads in Custody Law

August 11, 2025August 11, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Reichert v. Hornbeck ruling in Anne Arundel County exemplifies a troubling trend in Maryland law, where de facto parentage may undermine fit biological parents’ rights. Judge Morris granted standing to John H. Michel without justification, risking judicial overreach. The General Assembly must intervene to protect fundamental parental rights and clarify legal standards.

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence

August 11, 2025August 10, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Reichert v. Hornbeck, the Circuit Court has created a dangerous legal precedent by granting John H. Michel parental standing without any legal justification or consideration of the child’s wishes. This ruling threatens the rights of fit biological parents in Maryland, allowing judges to grant parental status to unrelated third parties arbitrarily.

bias

Two Years Without My Son: How Montgomery County Circuit Court Refuses to Enforce Custody Orders

Like this:

Why Family Court Judges Can Break the Law and Get Away With It

Like this:

Jamie Raskin: Professor of Partisanship, Congressman of Chaos

Like this:

Maryland’s Family Courts: Rights on Paper, Injustice in Practice

Like this:

The Family Court System: Where Justice Goes to Die

Like this:

“Pay Up or Shut Up”: How South Carolina’s Legal-Political Machine Silences Parents Like William Sewell

Like this:

Double Dipping Isn’t Just Maryland’s Problem – The National Pattern of Replacing Parents While Still Charging Support

Like this:

Child Support & “Double Dipping” – The Absurd Economics of Erasing a Parent

Like this:

Maryland’s Parent-Erasure Pattern: Dangerous Crossroads in Custody Law

Like this:

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence

Like this:

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman

“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well

No Warrant. No Order. Just Lies. — The San Marcos School Ambush Exposing Family Court Fraud

The Silence of the Brave: How Nancy Schaefer’s Death Unmasked a Web of Government Corruption Beyond CPS

The Shadow Guardian: Who Is John Michel and Why Is He Central to the Reichert v. Hornbeck Custody Crisis?

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: