Home » legal reform » Page 2

Trojan Justice: How Turner v. Rogers Gutted Due Process and Smuggled ADR Into the 14th Amendment

In Turner v. Rogers, the Supreme Court prioritized administrative efficiency over due process, allowing child support enforcement without legal counsel or proper hearings. This ruling disguised as a protective measure paved the way for administrative control, redefining justice as procedural checklists, compromising parental rights, and undermining constitutional protections.

Trojan Justice: How Turner v. Rogers Gutted Due Process and Smuggled ADR Into the 14th Amendment Read More

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out

William Sewell faces dire consequences following the Family Court of Dorchester County’s ruling granting custody of his daughter to his ex-wife, imposing significant financial burdens, and denying him legal representation. Despite these challenges, he pursues two post-judgment motions, arguing judicial bias and constitutional violations, determined to fight for his rights and child.

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out Read More

Justice for Sale? The Uncomfortable Truth Behind Family Court Corruption

The family court system, once a protective space for children, faces criticism for being corrupt, biased, and profit-driven. Secrecy, judicial discretion, and financial incentives create an environment where misconduct flourishes, harming vulnerable families. Reform advocates urge measures like transparency, independent oversight, and fair custody practices to safeguard children’s interests and restore trust.

Justice for Sale? The Uncomfortable Truth Behind Family Court Corruption Read More

The Idaho Child Marriage Loophole: When “Parental Rights” Become a Custody Workaround

Idaho’s marriage laws permit minors to marry with minimal oversight, leading to potential custody manipulation. A legal loophole allows one parent to unilaterally arrange marriages, bypassing court orders. This issue raises significant concerns about child protection and legal consistency, prompting calls for reforms to prevent exploitation and uphold family values.

The Idaho Child Marriage Loophole: When “Parental Rights” Become a Custody Workaround Read More

The Guardian Who Took Sides: Bias, Billing, and the Broken Role of a GAL in William Sewell’s Case

In William Sewell’s custody case, the Guardian ad Litem, Jason Wheeler, failed to maintain impartiality, favoring opposing legal counsel and neglecting serious allegations of neglect and substance abuse. His inadequate investigation and biased report raised questions about integrity in the court system, undermining trust and compromising the best interests of children.

The Guardian Who Took Sides: Bias, Billing, and the Broken Role of a GAL in William Sewell’s Case Read More

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files

Janice Wolk Grenadier is challenging Chief Justice John G. Roberts over the upcoming private gala at the Supreme Court, which she argues symbolizes elitism in the judiciary. She filed a Petition for Impeachment citing constitutional violations and calling for Congress to act against the growing disconnect between the legal elite and ordinary citizens.

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files Read More

Let the Child Be Heard: How Virginia’s New Law Empowers Truth and Justice in Family Court

Virginia’s new law, HB 2115, effective July 1, 2025, empowers judges to summon children in family court to address high-conflict custody disputes. This reform aims to ensure children’s voices are heard, countering parental manipulation and creating a more balanced legal process. Other states, like Maryland, should consider similar measures for accountability and transparency.

Let the Child Be Heard: How Virginia’s New Law Empowers Truth and Justice in Family Court Read More

“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well

The article discusses systemic corruption in South Carolina’s family courts, evidenced by William Sewell’s case, where he faces exorbitant legal fees and judicial favoritism. The judicial system protects entrenched attorneys and GALs who neglect children’s interests, silencing parents challenging unfair practices. The need for urgent judicial reform and oversight is emphasized.

“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well Read More