Home » family law reform » Page 3

Murder in Broad Daylight: Was the UC Berkeley Professor’s Killing in Greece More Than a “Custody Dispute Gone Wrong”?

A world-renowned professor traveled to Greece to see his children and fight for custody. He was murdered on the spot before he could knock on the door. The system says “senseless tragedy.” We say: how is the ex-wife not a suspect?

Murder in Broad Daylight: Was the UC Berkeley Professor’s Killing in Greece More Than a “Custody Dispute Gone Wrong”? Read More

Judges for Sale: The Quiet Power of ADR and the Revolving Door

The family court system’s reliance on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has turned justice into a for-profit enterprise, often forcing parents into mediation without considering safety or power dynamics. Retired judges transition into mediation roles, profiting from a system they once controlled, raising ethical concerns and perpetuating cycles of abuse and conflict.

Judges for Sale: The Quiet Power of ADR and the Revolving Door Read More

Where Is the Actual Abuse?

Jeff Reichert has no criminal conviction, no sustained finding of harm, and no credible evidence of abuse—yet he’s been violently arrested, silenced in court, and cut off from his son for nearly four years. Meanwhile, the real abusers—backed by money, influence, and judicial indifference—have faced no consequences. This is not a custody battle. This is legal child trafficking, carried out under the gavel of Maryland’s broken family court system. If it can happen to Jeff, it can happen to any parent.

Where Is the Actual Abuse? Read More

When Custody Turns into Crisis: Missouri Standoff Raises Tough Questions About Family Law, Enforcement, and Public Perception

A Missouri child custody dispute exploded into a full-scale standoff when a father refused to return his child and sent chilling threats to the mother and law enforcement. As a SWAT team surrounded his rural home, questions mounted—not just about his actions, but about the system that drove him there. In a nation increasingly divided over family law, this case exposes deeper cracks in how we handle custody, parental rights, and the consequences when justice feels out of reach.

When Custody Turns into Crisis: Missouri Standoff Raises Tough Questions About Family Law, Enforcement, and Public Perception Read More

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman

Westchester County Family Court faces criticism over Judge Michelle Schauer’s handling of Marc Fishman’s case, who has not seen his children in five years due to alleged judicial overreach and ignored evidence of parental alienation. Despite adhering to court requirements, Fishman is denied accommodations, highlighting systemic issues and raising urgent calls for reform.

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman Read More

A Second Declaration: How the Family Court Crisis Mirrors the Reasons We Fought for Independence

The article by Michael Phillips argues that modern family courts in the U.S. mirror the injustices of colonial rule, stripping parents of rights and imposing financial burdens without representation. It highlights issues of autonomy, accountability, and exploitation, urging a movement for reform to restore parental rights and challenge the corrupt judicial system.

A Second Declaration: How the Family Court Crisis Mirrors the Reasons We Fought for Independence Read More

Open Letter: A Year and a Half of Silence — And Still No Justice

Michael Phillips shares his 18-month struggle to maintain court-ordered parenting time with his son, Dylan, facing continuous denial from the Maryland family court system. Despite fulfilling his obligations, Phillips highlights widespread issues of “paper custody,” where courts fail to enforce orders, resulting in emotional and psychological harm to children.

Open Letter: A Year and a Half of Silence — And Still No Justice Read More

Let the Child Be Heard: How Virginia’s New Law Empowers Truth and Justice in Family Court

Virginia’s new law, HB 2115, effective July 1, 2025, empowers judges to summon children in family court to address high-conflict custody disputes. This reform aims to ensure children’s voices are heard, countering parental manipulation and creating a more balanced legal process. Other states, like Maryland, should consider similar measures for accountability and transparency.

Let the Child Be Heard: How Virginia’s New Law Empowers Truth and Justice in Family Court Read More

The Brennan Files: Maryland’s Most Dangerous Lawyer?

Brennan McCarthy isn’t just another divorce lawyer—he’s the architect behind one of Maryland’s most egregious custody scandals. Through venue shopping, legal intimidation, and courtroom manipulation, McCarthy helped orchestrate a midnight custody ambush and years of retaliatory litigation. This exposé uncovers the tactics, the players, and the disturbing pattern of abuse hiding behind a law degree.

The Brennan Files: Maryland’s Most Dangerous Lawyer? Read More

When Custody Reform Threatens Profits, the Legal Industry Panics

New Jersey Senate Bill S-4510 aims to prioritize children’s preferences in custody disputes and require evidence for reunification therapy, facing opposition from matrimonial lawyers concerned about profit loss. Critics argue it challenges the current system’s control and accountability, emphasizing the need for children’s voices in family court decisions and reforming the legal framework.

When Custody Reform Threatens Profits, the Legal Industry Panics Read More