Passport to Nowhere: How Child Support Enforcement Blocks Parents from Working

A Virginia parent faced barriers to employment due to bureaucratic hurdles related to child support enforcement. Despite a job offer contingent on obtaining a passport, an unexpected demand for a $5,000 payment plan arose. This illustrates systemic issues in child support agencies that perpetuate poverty through inflated arrears and lack of due process.

Passport to Nowhere: How Child Support Enforcement Blocks Parents from Working Read More

Why Family Court Judges Can Break the Law and Get Away With It

Family courts, intended to serve justice, often operate beyond the law, relying on a vague standard of “best interests of the child.” Judges wield unchecked power, enjoying immunity from accountability. Parents face significant disadvantages, lacking essential rights during proceedings. Urgent reforms are needed to ensure fairness and transparency in family law.

Why Family Court Judges Can Break the Law and Get Away With It Read More

Why Do Courts Hate Due Process? And Why It’s So Hard for Family Court Litigants to Obtain

Family courts often disregard constitutional due process, prioritizing expediency over fairness. This environment fosters misconduct due to secrecy and lack of oversight. Litigants, usually self-represented, may struggle to assert their rights. To combat this, parents must document objections, use specific legal terminology, file motions, and consider appeals to ensure accountability.

Why Do Courts Hate Due Process? And Why It’s So Hard for Family Court Litigants to Obtain Read More

Top 10 Worst Politicians for Family Values: How Their Laws and Leadership Helped Break American Families and Corrupt the Courts

The article critiques politicians from both parties for undermining families while promoting “family values.” It ranks ten key figures, highlighting their legislative failures that foster corrupt family court systems and harm parental rights. Ultimately, it calls for voters to demand reforms, emphasizing the impact of financial incentives on family dynamics and justice.

Top 10 Worst Politicians for Family Values: How Their Laws and Leadership Helped Break American Families and Corrupt the Courts Read More

When Justice Sleeps: What Happens When the Judge Doesn’t Read Your File

The article by Michael Phillips critiques the family court system, highlighting judges’ negligence in reviewing cases, leading to rubber-stamp rulings and biased decisions. It emphasizes the emotional toll on parents who feel unheard, calling for reforms like mandatory confirmation of document review and enhanced accountability to ensure fair hearings and justice in family courts.

When Justice Sleeps: What Happens When the Judge Doesn’t Read Your File Read More

The Silence of the Brave: How Nancy Schaefer’s Death Unmasked a Web of Government Corruption Beyond CPS

When Georgia State Senator Nancy Schaefer dared to expose the cash-for-kids corruption inside Child Protective Services, she uncovered more than bureaucratic mismanagement—she revealed a government-funded machine incentivized to destroy families. Months later, she was found dead. Labeled a murder-suicide by authorities, her death silenced one of the only voices willing to call CPS what it had become: a taxpayer-backed child trafficking operation. But the rot doesn’t end there. From family courts to federally funded NGOs, a sprawling web of secrecy and profit thrives—shielded by immunity, powered by incentives, and enforced through silence.

The Silence of the Brave: How Nancy Schaefer’s Death Unmasked a Web of Government Corruption Beyond CPS Read More

The Evidence They Ignored: How Judge Maurice Williams Buried the Truth in Marc Fishman’s Case

Marc Fishman, exonerated by New York officials for child abuse allegations, faces potential jail time from Judge Maurice Williams despite exculpatory evidence being withheld. A supervised visit confirmed by a court-appointed supervisor supports Fishman’s innocence, highlighting issues in the judicial system that seem to silence evidence conflicting with prior rulings.

The Evidence They Ignored: How Judge Maurice Williams Buried the Truth in Marc Fishman’s Case Read More

“Who’s Protecting the Children?”: John Myrick Calls for Family Court Investigation in Maryland

In Maryland, gubernatorial candidate John Myrick criticizes the family court system, arguing it’s corrupt and favors financial interests over children’s welfare. He highlights how Title IV-D funding exacerbates conflicts of interest, denying parental rights and causing family separation. Myrick calls for oversight reforms to enhance accountability and protect all parents’ rights.

“Who’s Protecting the Children?”: John Myrick Calls for Family Court Investigation in Maryland Read More

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case

The Sewell v. Sewell case illustrates a troubling pattern within the South Carolina Family Court, where twelve motions filed by William Sewell seeking justice were uniformly denied without adequate explanation. This systemic denial of due process highlights a court environment prioritizing power over fairness, leaving vulnerable parties without legal recourse or representation.

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case Read More

The Final Order: How Judge Mandy Kimmons Sealed William Sewell’s Fate

The Sewell v. Sewell case highlights judicial bias and misconduct in a custody trial led by Judge Mandy Kimmons. The ruling benefited opposing attorney Donnie Gamache, disregarded William Sewell’s rights, and imposed unfair financial penalties. This case exemplifies systemic issues in family courts, necessitating immediate investigations and reforms to protect litigants’ rights.

The Final Order: How Judge Mandy Kimmons Sealed William Sewell’s Fate Read More