Tag: Constitutional Law
2026 Election Cycle / Campaigns / Congress / Dark Money / Elections / Federal Court / Fiscal Spending / Government / Supreme Court

Supreme Court Takes Up Blockbuster Challenge to Federal Campaign-Spending Limits

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The U.S. Supreme Court is now weighing a major challenge to federal limits on coordinated campaign spending — a case that could dramatically expand how much political parties can spend directly with their candidates. GOP committees argue the restrictions violate the First Amendment, and the Court’s ruling could reshape the financial landscape of the 2026 midterms.

Supreme Court Takes Up Blockbuster Challenge to Federal Campaign-Spending Limits Read More
Constitutional Law / Federal Court / Judicial / Policy / Politics / Supreme Court

Trump v. Slaughter: The Supreme Court Case That Could Rewire Presidential Power — and America’s System of Administrative Justice Along With It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court case Trump v. Slaughter threatens the independence of various regulatory agencies by potentially overturning the precedent set by Humphrey’s Executor. The outcome could grant presidents at-will removal authority over agency commissioners, reshape administrative courts, and diminish judicial oversight, leading to increased regulatory uncertainty and political influence over enforcement actions.

Trump v. Slaughter: The Supreme Court Case That Could Rewire Presidential Power — and America’s System of Administrative Justice Along With It Read More
Constitutional Law / Government / Government / Government Reform / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Great Constitutional Correction: How Courts Are Re-Drawing the Lines of Power

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Recent court cases across the U.S. are reshaping governmental authority, challenging the power dynamics between Congress, the President, and unelected agencies. The Rhode Island case signifies a judicial push to restore constitutional balance by questioning executive overreach and emergency powers. This movement aims to reestablish accountability within American governance structures.

The Great Constitutional Correction: How Courts Are Re-Drawing the Lines of Power Read More
bias / Constitutional Law / Donald Trump / Executive / History / Legal History / News & Media / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Trump, Presidential Power, and Politico’s Short Memory

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Politico article discusses Donald Trump’s second term and his legal battles over executive power but questions whether his actions are truly unprecedented. It argues that past presidents have similarly expanded powers but without the same scrutiny. The real concern, it suggests, stems from Trump’s lack of political approval, not constitutional violation.

Trump, Presidential Power, and Politico’s Short Memory Read More
Constitutional Law / Crime & Violence / Free Speech / Laws / Political Violence / Politics / Rights and Freedoms / Supreme Court

Bondi’s Warning: Where Free Speech Ends and Criminal Threats Begin

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s recent tweet has reignited the debate over where free speech ends and criminal threats begin. While the First Amendment protects even hateful and violent rhetoric, the Supreme Court has drawn a sharp line at incitement to imminent violence and true threats. From Brandenburg v. Ohio to Virginia v. Black, case law makes clear that speech celebrating violence may be legal—but urging a mob to act or issuing a direct death threat is not. Bondi’s warning underscores a simple truth: speech is free, but violence has consequences.

Bondi’s Warning: Where Free Speech Ends and Criminal Threats Begin Read More
Free Speech / Government / Government / Governor / Maryland / Politics / Rights and Freedoms

Wes Moore Just Got a Constitutional Slapdown

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Governor Wes Moore’s administration faced scrutiny after the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a gag rule linked to Maryland’s Digital Advertising Tax, exposing intentions to shield political accountability. This ruling highlighted the administration’s failure to maintain transparency, undermining Moore’s credibility as a leader committed to integrity and reform.

Wes Moore Just Got a Constitutional Slapdown Read More
Accountability / Advocacy / Attorneys / Attorneys / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Fraud / Government Corruption / Judges / Misconduct / South Carolina / South Carolina Watch / The Corruption Series

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

William Sewell faces dire consequences following the Family Court of Dorchester County’s ruling granting custody of his daughter to his ex-wife, imposing significant financial burdens, and denying him legal representation. Despite these challenges, he pursues two post-judgment motions, arguing judicial bias and constitutional violations, determined to fight for his rights and child.

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out Read More
Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judges / Locked Out of Justice / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / Voting / Voting Rights

The Quiet Coup: How ADR Replaced the Constitution and No One Voted for It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

By Michael Phillips In a sharp and carefully phrased academic critique, Professor Eric Yamamoto confirms what many legal reformers have long suspected: the American justice system has been quietly hijacked. …

The Quiet Coup: How ADR Replaced the Constitution and No One Voted for It Read More
Accountability / Budget / democrats / Donald Trump / Education / Education / Federal / Federal Funding / Fraud / GOP / Government / Government / Legislation / Money and Finance / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Finally, A Course Correction: Why Shrinking the U.S. Department of Education Is Long Overdue

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court’s July 2025 ruling to uphold cuts to the Department of Education is seen as a victory for state control over education, countering federal overreach. Critics argue it threatens public schools, but supporters view it as a chance to empower local leaders, enhance accountability, and prioritize education over political agendas.

Finally, A Course Correction: Why Shrinking the U.S. Department of Education Is Long Overdue Read More
Constitutional Law / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / Laws / Opinion / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In a significant opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett criticized Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in Trump v. CASA, Inc., highlighting the dangers of judicial overreach and the role of courts. She emphasized that judges must interpret the law, not legislate, marking a crucial boundary for future judicial conduct.

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court Read More