Home » Civil Liberties » Page 2

Supreme Court Checks Trump’s National Guard Deployment — For Now

The Supreme Court’s emergency ruling in Trump v. Illinois blocks — for now — the federalization of National Guard troops for immigration enforcement, exposing deep divisions over executive power, domestic military use, and how far a president can go without invoking the Insurrection Act.

Supreme Court Checks Trump’s National Guard Deployment — For Now Read More

The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom.

Los Angeles and San Diego officials are withholding public records related to the prosecution of Giselle Farias Smiel, raising concerns about transparency and due process. Despite legal obligations under the California Public Records Act, agencies have issued denials and delays, undermining public trust and accountability in the justice system.

The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom. Read More

“Evidence, Not Ideology” — If Only the ABA Lived By Its Own Words

The American Bar Association (ABA) recently advocated for evidence-based justice while criticizing political influences. However, it faces accusations of selective outrage and inconsistency regarding its principles. The ABA’s historical silence on systemic injustices raises doubts about its commitment to neutrality. True reform requires the ABA to uphold its stated values across all cases.

“Evidence, Not Ideology” — If Only the ABA Lived By Its Own Words Read More

“Free DC” or Free Pass to Chaos? The Battle Over Trump’s Takeover of Washington, D.C.

Thousands protested in D.C. under the “Free DC” banner, opposing Trump’s federal intervention stemming from rising crime concerns. Activists argue for local control amid a backdrop of racial and political dissonance. The protest reveals deeper national divides over security, governance, and the legitimacy of federal authority in the capital.

“Free DC” or Free Pass to Chaos? The Battle Over Trump’s Takeover of Washington, D.C. Read More

Trump Was Right to Step In on D.C. Crime — But Federal Agents Don’t Get a Free Pass to Trample Rights

Washington, D.C. is suffering from rising crime and lawlessness, prompting President Trump to intervene for restoration of order. However, federal actions must not violate the Fourth Amendment or intimidate citizens. True leadership targets criminals while ensuring accountability and upholding liberties. Safety should not come at the expense of individual freedoms.

Trump Was Right to Step In on D.C. Crime — But Federal Agents Don’t Get a Free Pass to Trample Rights Read More

The McMahon Machine: Where Feelings Are Felonies and Substack Is a Crime Scene

In Staten Island, free speech isn’t just under fire — it’s apparently a criminal offense. DA Mike McMahon, rattled by a Substack post that bruised his ego, is now treating satire like sabotage and dissent like a felony. If feelings are the new felony standard, we might need to build more jails — for writers, bloggers, and anyone with a spine. Welcome to McMahon’s America, where the Constitution takes a backseat to crybaby prosecution.

The McMahon Machine: Where Feelings Are Felonies and Substack Is a Crime Scene Read More

Free Speech Under Attack: Staten Island DA Issues Arrest Warrant Over Substack Email

Staten Island DA Michael McMahon has issued an arrest warrant for Richard Luthmann, a disbarred attorney, over a Substack post deemed threatening. Critics argue this is an infringement on First Amendment rights and an abuse of power, raising concerns about political retaliation and the implications for free expression in America.

Free Speech Under Attack: Staten Island DA Issues Arrest Warrant Over Substack Email Read More

The Mica Adler Case: How Overreach and Ideology in Maine’s Child Welfare System Break Families Apart

When a jury clears a mother of abuse charges and even the state drops its case—yet she still can’t regain custody of her son—you’re no longer looking at justice. You’re looking at ideology disguised as protection. The Mica Adler case reveals how Maine’s child welfare system punishes poverty, out-of-the-box parenting, and nonconformity while failing to prioritize real child safety. It’s not about the best interests of the child—it’s about obedience to a bureaucratic standard.

The Mica Adler Case: How Overreach and Ideology in Maine’s Child Welfare System Break Families Apart Read More

A Second Declaration: How the Family Court Crisis Mirrors the Reasons We Fought for Independence

The article by Michael Phillips argues that modern family courts in the U.S. mirror the injustices of colonial rule, stripping parents of rights and imposing financial burdens without representation. It highlights issues of autonomy, accountability, and exploitation, urging a movement for reform to restore parental rights and challenge the corrupt judicial system.

A Second Declaration: How the Family Court Crisis Mirrors the Reasons We Fought for Independence Read More

The Business of Broken Families: How Corporations Profit from Child Support Enforcement

The child support enforcement system, often seen as protective, is critiqued for being a profit-driven network. It utilizes administrative measures bypassing judicial oversight, leading to punitive actions against struggling parents. This system, enriched by corporate contractors, harms families, particularly fathers, while demanding reform for transparency and due process.

The Business of Broken Families: How Corporations Profit from Child Support Enforcement Read More