Home » Civil Liberties » Page 3

Tag: Civil Liberties
Citizens Services / Civil Rights / Crime Violence / democrats / Policy / The Reichert Files / voter outreach

Democrats Outraged Over One Arrest — But Where Was Their Outrage for the Rest of Us?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The arrest of Senator Alex Padilla during a protest has sparked outrage among Democrats, with Representative Jamie Raskin condemning it as authoritarian. However, Maryland veteran Jeff Reichert highlights hypocrisy, recalling his own wrongful arrests amid silence from the party. He emphasizes that justice should apply universally, not just for political gain.

Democrats Outraged Over One Arrest — But Where Was Their Outrage for the Rest of Us? Read More
Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Laws

The Myth of ‘Military-Style’ Weapons and the Real Agenda Behind Gun Control in Maryland

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Maryland Firearm Safety Act of 2013, banning certain rifles and high-capacity magazines, is presented as a safety measure, but critics argue it targets lawful gun owners under the guise of public policy. The discussion surrounds broader themes of disarmament, governmental control, and the need to protect Second Amendment rights against perceived overreach.

The Myth of ‘Military-Style’ Weapons and the Real Agenda Behind Gun Control in Maryland Read More
Advocacy / Civil Rights / Court Reform / Crime Violence

The Silent Epidemic of False Accusations — And Why No One in Power Wants to Talk About It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The article highlights that 20 million Americans report being falsely accused of domestic violence, yet this issue remains unaddressed in media and legislation. It critiques the neglect of due process in favor of funding and narratives that prioritize victims, emphasizing the need for reform to protect the rights of the wrongfully accused.

The Silent Epidemic of False Accusations — And Why No One in Power Wants to Talk About It Read More
Advocacy / Constitutional Law / Legislation / Privitization / Regulatory

Justice for Sale: How ADR Courts Hijacked Due Process and Made You Pay for It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The post critiques the shift from traditional courts, which uphold justice as a constitutional right, to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) systems that charge for legal services, undermining due process. It highlights court cases emphasizing access to justice without fees and calls for reform to restore constitutional rights and challenge the financial burden placed on litigants.

Justice for Sale: How ADR Courts Hijacked Due Process and Made You Pay for It Read More
Congress / Criminal / Executive Order / Regulatory / Surveillance

Luna’s Patriot Act Repeal Is a PR Move That Misses the Real Threat

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna’s “American Privacy Restoration Act” aims to repeal the Patriot Act to enhance civil liberties. However, this move is largely symbolic as the surveillance state has evolved beyond the Patriot Act. True reform is needed to address systemic issues and the complex frameworks enabling continued surveillance.

Luna’s Patriot Act Repeal Is a PR Move That Misses the Real Threat Read More
Criminal / Executive Order / Regulatory

Trump’s Executive Order Strikes at the Heart of the Regulatory State—Why Almost No One Noticed

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

On May 10, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at reducing the overreach of the federal regulatory system. It mandates transparency in criminal regulations, emphasizes intent in prosecutions, and advocates for clearer laws enacted by elected officials. This significant reform challenges the unchecked power of the administrative state.

Trump’s Executive Order Strikes at the Heart of the Regulatory State—Why Almost No One Noticed Read More
Constitutional Law / Family Court / Judicial / Montgomery County / Supreme Court

The Constitution Is Not a Vibe: How Parham v. J.R. and Other Landmark Cases Expose the Lie at the Heart of Mahmoud v. Taylor

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Mahmoud v. Taylor highlights a troubling trend in American family courts where fit parents’ rights are overridden based on vague “best interest” claims without proof of unfitness or harm. This undermines due process, as courts increasingly disregard constitutional protections for parental rights, leading to unjust custody decisions. Immediate reform is necessary.

The Constitution Is Not a Vibe: How Parham v. J.R. and Other Landmark Cases Expose the Lie at the Heart of Mahmoud v. Taylor Read More