Home » transparency » Page 3

Shadows on the Bench: Maryland’s Judicial Campaign Finance Transparency Problem

Judicial integrity in Maryland is compromised by lack of transparency in campaign financing, especially from lawyers and dark money groups. Current laws allow special interests to unduly influence judges, diminishing public trust. Proposed reforms aim to enhance transparency, limit donor contributions, and ensure a fair judicial election system, restoring confidence in the judiciary.

Shadows on the Bench: Maryland’s Judicial Campaign Finance Transparency Problem Read More

Seven Ways Montgomery County Circuit Court Enables Custodial Interference

The author describes their experience with Montgomery County Circuit Court, highlighting systemic failures in enforcing custody orders. Key issues include treating violations as disputes, failing to enforce contempt, prioritizing mediation, and ignoring parental alienation. These practices harm both children and parents, necessitating accountability and transparency in family courts to protect children’s rights.

Seven Ways Montgomery County Circuit Court Enables Custodial Interference Read More

Wes Moore Slips Out the Back Door: Maryland’s Governor Ducks Media as Nonprofit Spending Scandal Grows

On August 19, 2025, Maryland Governor Wes Moore evaded reporters after heralding job growth at a cybersecurity event, raising concerns about his administration’s opaque nonprofit spending. Despite a $3 billion deficit and bipartisan calls for transparency, Moore’s departure without addressing accountability issues symbolizes a troubling lack of leadership and fiscal responsibility.

Wes Moore Slips Out the Back Door: Maryland’s Governor Ducks Media as Nonprofit Spending Scandal Grows Read More

Chris Van Hollen: Maryland’s Senator of Sour Grapes

Wes Moore and Senator Chris Van Hollen represent contrasting political personas in Maryland, with Moore as an optimistic leader and Van Hollen as a perpetual complainer. Van Hollen’s focus on condemning Republican policies overshadows genuine governance, leading to accusations of hyper-partisanship and ineffective political theatrics, ultimately failing to deliver practical solutions for constituents.

Chris Van Hollen: Maryland’s Senator of Sour Grapes Read More

Title IV-D: South Carolina’s Child Support “Incentive” Program or Judicial Slush Fund?

The Title IV-D child support enforcement program, intended to aid families, is under scrutiny in South Carolina due to alleged misuse of funds by officials. Indictments against clerks for embezzlement highlight systemic issues, revealing a revenue-driven focus that undermines justice, disproportionately affecting low-income fathers and raising concerns about due process in child support cases.

Title IV-D: South Carolina’s Child Support “Incentive” Program or Judicial Slush Fund? Read More

Maryland’s Parent-Erasure Pattern: Dangerous Crossroads in Custody Law

The Reichert v. Hornbeck ruling in Anne Arundel County exemplifies a troubling trend in Maryland law, where de facto parentage may undermine fit biological parents’ rights. Judge Morris granted standing to John H. Michel without justification, risking judicial overreach. The General Assembly must intervene to protect fundamental parental rights and clarify legal standards.

Maryland’s Parent-Erasure Pattern: Dangerous Crossroads in Custody Law Read More

When Justice Sleeps: What Happens When the Judge Doesn’t Read Your File

The article by Michael Phillips critiques the family court system, highlighting judges’ negligence in reviewing cases, leading to rubber-stamp rulings and biased decisions. It emphasizes the emotional toll on parents who feel unheard, calling for reforms like mandatory confirmation of document review and enhanced accountability to ensure fair hearings and justice in family courts.

When Justice Sleeps: What Happens When the Judge Doesn’t Read Your File Read More

The Declaration of Parental Rights: A Manifesto for Family Freedom in a Time of Overreach

In 2025, the narrative emphasizes that children belong to their parents, not the government. A modern Declaration of Parental Rights asserts that parental authority is paramount, critiques the family court system, advocates for shared parenting, and calls for accountability among judges and authorities. It urges a restoration of family rights against state intervention.

The Declaration of Parental Rights: A Manifesto for Family Freedom in a Time of Overreach Read More

The Mica Adler Case: How Overreach and Ideology in Maine’s Child Welfare System Break Families Apart

When a jury clears a mother of abuse charges and even the state drops its case—yet she still can’t regain custody of her son—you’re no longer looking at justice. You’re looking at ideology disguised as protection. The Mica Adler case reveals how Maine’s child welfare system punishes poverty, out-of-the-box parenting, and nonconformity while failing to prioritize real child safety. It’s not about the best interests of the child—it’s about obedience to a bureaucratic standard.

The Mica Adler Case: How Overreach and Ideology in Maine’s Child Welfare System Break Families Apart Read More

A Preventable Tragedy: Hot Car Death in Maryland Demands Parental Vigilance, Not More Bureaucracy

A 6-month-old baby girl in Maryland died after being left in a hot car, marking the second such incident in the state this year. Experts highlight these tragedies often stem from memory failures rather than malice, emphasizing the need for personal responsibility over legal penalties. Community awareness and safety habits are crucial for prevention.

A Preventable Tragedy: Hot Car Death in Maryland Demands Parental Vigilance, Not More Bureaucracy Read More