Home » Topics » Supreme Court » Page 2

Supreme Court
American / Family Values / Free Speech / Freedom of the Press / Political Violence / Politics / Religious Freedom / Rights and Freedoms / Supreme Court

Faith, Family, Freedom, Forgiveness vs. “Extremists”: Why Democrats’ Rhetoric After Charlie Kirk’s Murder Feels Like Gasoline on the Fire

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

While conservatives gathered to honor Charlie Kirk with themes of faith, family, freedom, and forgiveness, Democrats doubled down on labeling their opponents “extremists” and attacking the Supreme Court. In the very week that forgiveness triumphed over rage, their rhetoric poured gasoline on the fire—fueling division and empowering the radicals who act on words of hate.

Faith, Family, Freedom, Forgiveness vs. “Extremists”: Why Democrats’ Rhetoric After Charlie Kirk’s Murder Feels Like Gasoline on the Fire Read More
Constitutional Law / Crime & Violence / Free Speech / Laws / Political Violence / Politics / Rights and Freedoms / Supreme Court

Bondi’s Warning: Where Free Speech Ends and Criminal Threats Begin

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s recent tweet has reignited the debate over where free speech ends and criminal threats begin. While the First Amendment protects even hateful and violent rhetoric, the Supreme Court has drawn a sharp line at incitement to imminent violence and true threats. From Brandenburg v. Ohio to Virginia v. Black, case law makes clear that speech celebrating violence may be legal—but urging a mob to act or issuing a direct death threat is not. Bondi’s warning underscores a simple truth: speech is free, but violence has consequences.

Bondi’s Warning: Where Free Speech Ends and Criminal Threats Begin Read More
Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Constitutional Rights / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Fraud / Government / Government / Government Corruption / Government Waste / IRS / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Income Illusion: How America’s Tax and Child Support Laws Collide with Supreme Court Precedent

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The U.S. tax and child support systems rest on a legal contradiction: for over a century, the Supreme Court has maintained that wages are not “income,” yet the IRS and child support agencies tax and seize wages as if they are. This inconsistency raises serious constitutional concerns, affecting Americans’ rights and finances.

The Income Illusion: How America’s Tax and Child Support Laws Collide with Supreme Court Precedent Read More
Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Judges / Legal Reform / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / The Corruption Series

Trojan Justice: How Turner v. Rogers Gutted Due Process and Smuggled ADR Into the 14th Amendment

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Turner v. Rogers, the Supreme Court prioritized administrative efficiency over due process, allowing child support enforcement without legal counsel or proper hearings. This ruling disguised as a protective measure paved the way for administrative control, redefining justice as procedural checklists, compromising parental rights, and undermining constitutional protections.

Trojan Justice: How Turner v. Rogers Gutted Due Process and Smuggled ADR Into the 14th Amendment Read More
Accountability / Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Child Support / Child Support / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Federal Funding / Government / Government Corruption / Legal History / Money and Finance / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / The Corruption Series / Washington, DC

The Fall of ADR: How the Supreme Court’s 2025 Rulings Exposed the Unconstitutional Rise of Shadow Justice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

On July 14, 2025, the Supreme Court rulings in Trump v. J.G.G. and Kennedy v. Braidwood dismantled the legal framework of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), declaring only Article III courts can issue binding decisions. This has led to a crisis in state courts, exposing potentially void past rulings and requiring significant judicial reform.

The Fall of ADR: How the Supreme Court’s 2025 Rulings Exposed the Unconstitutional Rise of Shadow Justice Read More
Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judges / Locked Out of Justice / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / Voting / Voting Rights

The Quiet Coup: How ADR Replaced the Constitution and No One Voted for It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

By Michael Phillips In a sharp and carefully phrased academic critique, Professor Eric Yamamoto confirms what many legal reformers have long suspected: the American justice system has been quietly hijacked. …

The Quiet Coup: How ADR Replaced the Constitution and No One Voted for It Read More
Accountability / Budget / democrats / Donald Trump / Education / Education / Federal / Federal Funding / Fraud / GOP / Government / Government / Legislation / Money and Finance / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Finally, A Course Correction: Why Shrinking the U.S. Department of Education Is Long Overdue

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court’s July 2025 ruling to uphold cuts to the Department of Education is seen as a victory for state control over education, countering federal overreach. Critics argue it threatens public schools, but supporters view it as a chance to empower local leaders, enhance accountability, and prioritize education over political agendas.

Finally, A Course Correction: Why Shrinking the U.S. Department of Education Is Long Overdue Read More
Judicial / Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / Virginia / Washington, DC

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files (Part 2)

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The American Inns of Court (AIC) operates as a private, powerful guild influencing the U.S. judiciary without public oversight or accountability. This secretive organization fosters bias and creates a legal caste system. Recent impeachment calls against Chief Justice Roberts have spotlighted these issues, raising concerns about fairness and transparency in the justice system.

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files (Part 2) Read More
Family Court / Government / Government / Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files / Locked Out of Justice / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / Whistleblower Reports

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Janice Wolk Grenadier is challenging Chief Justice John G. Roberts over the upcoming private gala at the Supreme Court, which she argues symbolizes elitism in the judiciary. She filed a Petition for Impeachment citing constitutional violations and calling for Congress to act against the growing disconnect between the legal elite and ordinary citizens.

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files Read More
Constitutional Law / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / Laws / Opinion / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In a significant opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett criticized Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in Trump v. CASA, Inc., highlighting the dangers of judicial overreach and the role of courts. She emphasized that judges must interpret the law, not legislate, marking a crucial boundary for future judicial conduct.

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court Read More