Misconduct Archives - Page 5 of 7

Brandon Scott’s Baltimore: Crime Stats, Spin, and the Reality on the Streets

August 17, 2025August 16, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott promotes significant crime reductions, but residents experience ongoing violence, particularly in neighborhoods like Curtis Bay. Critics argue he prioritizes race politics and self-image over addressing real issues, while law enforcement suggests improvements stem from changes by others. Concerns about fiscal mismanagement and transparency further complicate his narrative.

Accountability / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Divorce / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Misconduct / parental rights

The Family Court System: Where Justice Goes to Die

August 16, 2025August 15, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system is designed to exploit vulnerable parents rather than deliver justice. Many enter with misguided beliefs about fairness, only to face manipulation and financial drain. High-conflict individuals often thrive while innocent parents suffer, resulting in emotional and financial devastation. The system needs abolition and replacement to truly protect children.

Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judicial / Misconduct / South Carolina / South Carolina Watch / The Corruption Series / transparency

Title IV-D: South Carolina’s Child Support “Incentive” Program or Judicial Slush Fund?

August 15, 2025August 15, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Title IV-D child support enforcement program, intended to aid families, is under scrutiny in South Carolina due to alleged misuse of funds by officials. Indictments against clerks for embezzlement highlight systemic issues, revealing a revenue-driven focus that undermines justice, disproportionately affecting low-income fathers and raising concerns about due process in child support cases.

“Pay Up or Shut Up”: How South Carolina’s Legal-Political Machine Silences Parents Like William Sewell

August 15, 2025August 15, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

William Sewell’s case in South Carolina highlights systemic failures in family court, revealing a punitive culture against parents exposing corruption. Legislator Gill Gatch’s remarks underscore a corrupt pay-to-play system, where speaking out leads to ostracization while silence necessitates financial submission, ultimately jeopardizing families and perpetuating injustices.

Double Dipping Isn’t Just Maryland’s Problem – The National Pattern of Replacing Parents While Still Charging Support

August 14, 2025August 14, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Maryland, courts permit a “de facto father” to replace the biological parent while still enforcing child support obligations, highlighting a troubling trend in family courts nationwide. This practice benefits states financially, creating a system where parental rights are diminished yet financial obligations persist, often under the guise of the child’s best interests.

Anne Arundel County / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Family Values / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Misconduct / Money and Finance / The Corruption Series / The Reichert Files

Child Support & “Double Dipping” – The Absurd Economics of Erasing a Parent

August 14, 2025August 14, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Reichert v. Hornbeck case highlights the absurdity of Maryland’s family court system, where a biological father is forced to pay child support despite being replaced as a parent without due process. This practice not only undermines the child’s best interests but also serves the economic interests of the court and state.

Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Civil Rights / Constitutional Rights / Education / Education / Family Court / Father's Rights / Misconduct / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms

Back to School — But Locked Out: When Schools Ignore a Non-Custodial Parent’s Rights

August 14, 2025August 13, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Many non-custodial parents face exclusion from their child’s education due to school policies, despite legal rights under FERPA. Schools often fear litigation, misunderstand laws, or cave to custodial parent pressure. Parents should document denials, request policies in writing, and escalate issues legally if necessary to secure their rights to access educational records.

Anne Arundel County / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Misconduct / parental rights / The Corruption Series / The Reichert Files / transparency

Maryland’s Parent-Erasure Pattern: Dangerous Crossroads in Custody Law

August 11, 2025August 11, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Reichert v. Hornbeck ruling in Anne Arundel County exemplifies a troubling trend in Maryland law, where de facto parentage may undermine fit biological parents’ rights. Judge Morris granted standing to John H. Michel without justification, risking judicial overreach. The General Assembly must intervene to protect fundamental parental rights and clarify legal standards.

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence

August 11, 2025August 10, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Reichert v. Hornbeck, the Circuit Court has created a dangerous legal precedent by granting John H. Michel parental standing without any legal justification or consideration of the child’s wishes. This ruling threatens the rights of fit biological parents in Maryland, allowing judges to grant parental status to unrelated third parties arbitrarily.

Accountability / bias / Corruption / Free Speech / Freedom of the Press / Misconduct / News & Media / Rights and Freedoms

Medium’s War on Independent Journalists: How the Platform Silences the Wrong Voices

August 9, 2025August 9, 2025 - by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Michael Phillips laments Medium’s suppression of investigative journalism, detailing his experience of having his accounts abruptly suspended without explanation. He argues that the platform discriminates against serious topics like political corruption and family court issues, prioritizing corporate interests over independent reporting. This trend threatens freedom of the press and accountability.

Misconduct

Brandon Scott’s Baltimore: Crime Stats, Spin, and the Reality on the Streets

Like this:

The Family Court System: Where Justice Goes to Die

Like this:

Title IV-D: South Carolina’s Child Support “Incentive” Program or Judicial Slush Fund?

Like this:

“Pay Up or Shut Up”: How South Carolina’s Legal-Political Machine Silences Parents Like William Sewell

Like this:

Double Dipping Isn’t Just Maryland’s Problem – The National Pattern of Replacing Parents While Still Charging Support

Like this:

Child Support & “Double Dipping” – The Absurd Economics of Erasing a Parent

Like this:

Back to School — But Locked Out: When Schools Ignore a Non-Custodial Parent’s Rights

Like this:

Maryland’s Parent-Erasure Pattern: Dangerous Crossroads in Custody Law

Like this:

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence

Like this:

Medium’s War on Independent Journalists: How the Platform Silences the Wrong Voices

Like this:

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman

“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well

No Warrant. No Order. Just Lies. — The San Marcos School Ambush Exposing Family Court Fraud

The Silence of the Brave: How Nancy Schaefer’s Death Unmasked a Web of Government Corruption Beyond CPS

The Shadow Guardian: Who Is John Michel and Why Is He Central to the Reichert v. Hornbeck Custody Crisis?

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: