Home » Location » Page 47

Paralyzed by Procedure: How Family Court Turns Technicalities Into Injustice

Family court in New York often prioritizes procedural technicalities over truth, resulting in devastating consequences for parents like Marc Fishman, who struggles for access to his children due to bureaucratic failures. The system frequently dismisses claims based on flawed processes, not factual inaccuracies, highlighting an urgent need for reform to restore fair access to justice.

Paralyzed by Procedure: How Family Court Turns Technicalities Into Injustice Read More

Buried by Design: What Is Maryland Family Court Hiding in the Reichert Case?

The Reichert v. Hornbeck custody case exposes systemic failures in Maryland courts that prevent Jeff Reichert from seeing his son, Grant, for over three years. Protective orders used against him appear to facilitate alienation, while concerns arise over the questionable circumstances surrounding Grant’s living arrangements and the mother’s history, raising suspicions of misconduct and abuse.

Buried by Design: What Is Maryland Family Court Hiding in the Reichert Case? Read More

The Firing of a Fraud Fighter: Why Are Baltimore Democrats So Afraid of Kelly Madigan?

Baltimore County Executive Kathy Klausmeier has opted not to reappoint Inspector General Kelly Madigan, citing her effective anti-corruption efforts. Madigan’s investigations revealed ethical misconduct among high-ranking officials, threatening local political interests. Her dismissal signals a troubling trend of suppressing transparency and accountability in government, undermining public trust in Maryland politics.

The Firing of a Fraud Fighter: Why Are Baltimore Democrats So Afraid of Kelly Madigan? Read More

The Cracks Are Showing: How Judicial Elites Are Finally Facing the Mirror

The legal profession’s integrity is being questioned as conflicts of interest within the judiciary are exposed, particularly in New Jersey, where judges control lawyers’ careers. Instances of judicial hypocrisy, such as a judge’s arrest for obstruction, highlight systemic double standards. Citizens demand accountability while the system faces increasing scrutiny and calls for reform.

The Cracks Are Showing: How Judicial Elites Are Finally Facing the Mirror Read More

The Case Maryland Wants to Bury: Inside Reichert v. Hornbeck

The Reichert v. Hornbeck case details a father’s arduous battle for custody over his son, marked by systemic biases and legal obstacles. Jeff Reichert’s parental rights were revoked without appropriate justification, exacerbated by the Maryland judiciary’s refusal to publicly document critical rulings. This case highlights alarming issues within family law and judicial transparency.

The Case Maryland Wants to Bury: Inside Reichert v. Hornbeck Read More

No Note-Taker, No Justice: How Family Court Denies ADA Rights

America’s family courts are violating the ADA by denying essential accommodations to disabled litigants like Marc Fishman, who faced obstacles accessing legal proceedings. This inconsistency represents a double standard compared to federal courts, undermining equal protection. Reform is crucial to ensure equitable access and accountability for family court judges regarding disability rights.

No Note-Taker, No Justice: How Family Court Denies ADA Rights Read More

Two Schools. Two Kids. No Court Order. Why I’m Investigating a Disturbing Attempted Child Removal in San Marcos.

On May 1, 2025, officials from various agencies attempted to remove Giselle Smiel’s children from school without legal authorization or notification. Despite no court order and no emergencies declared, this incident highlights serious violations of parental rights and due process. An investigation has been launched to uncover the circumstances behind this alarming event.

Two Schools. Two Kids. No Court Order. Why I’m Investigating a Disturbing Attempted Child Removal in San Marcos. Read More

When Judges Judge Their Own Cases: Why Recusal Rules Fail in Family Court

In America’s family courts, the principle that no one should be a judge in their own case is often violated. The case of Marc Fishman highlights this issue, as Judge Michelle I. Schauer, with a contentious history with Fishman, asserts control over his custody case despite allegations of bias and ethical concerns, undermining judicial impartiality.

When Judges Judge Their Own Cases: Why Recusal Rules Fail in Family Court Read More

Holy Hell, Maryland: What the Heck Is Going on in Reichert v. Hornbeck?

The article uncovers the troubling 15-year child custody case of Jeffrey Reichert and Sarah Hornbeck, highlighting numerous unanswered questions about parental alienation and judicial accountability. It discusses the obscurity of unpublished appellate opinions, potential corruption in Anne Arundel County courts, and the impact on the child caught in the fray.

Holy Hell, Maryland: What the Heck Is Going on in Reichert v. Hornbeck? Read More