Home » Location » Page 49

Location
Baltimore County / Government / Government Waste

The Firing of a Fraud Fighter: Why Are Baltimore Democrats So Afraid of Kelly Madigan?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Baltimore County Executive Kathy Klausmeier has opted not to reappoint Inspector General Kelly Madigan, citing her effective anti-corruption efforts. Madigan’s investigations revealed ethical misconduct among high-ranking officials, threatening local political interests. Her dismissal signals a troubling trend of suppressing transparency and accountability in government, undermining public trust in Maryland politics.

The Firing of a Fraud Fighter: Why Are Baltimore Democrats So Afraid of Kelly Madigan? Read More
Court Reform / Judges / Judicial / New Jersey

The Cracks Are Showing: How Judicial Elites Are Finally Facing the Mirror

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The legal profession’s integrity is being questioned as conflicts of interest within the judiciary are exposed, particularly in New Jersey, where judges control lawyers’ careers. Instances of judicial hypocrisy, such as a judge’s arrest for obstruction, highlight systemic double standards. Citizens demand accountability while the system faces increasing scrutiny and calls for reform.

The Cracks Are Showing: How Judicial Elites Are Finally Facing the Mirror Read More
Anne Arundel County / Appellate Court / Baltimore County / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Family Court / Judges / The Reichert Files

The Case Maryland Wants to Bury: Inside Reichert v. Hornbeck

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

The Reichert v. Hornbeck case details a father’s arduous battle for custody over his son, marked by systemic biases and legal obstacles. Jeff Reichert’s parental rights were revoked without appropriate justification, exacerbated by the Maryland judiciary’s refusal to publicly document critical rulings. This case highlights alarming issues within family law and judicial transparency.

The Case Maryland Wants to Bury: Inside Reichert v. Hornbeck Read More
Ada Accommodations / Family Court / New York / The Fishman Files

No Note-Taker, No Justice: How Family Court Denies ADA Rights

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

America’s family courts are violating the ADA by denying essential accommodations to disabled litigants like Marc Fishman, who faced obstacles accessing legal proceedings. This inconsistency represents a double standard compared to federal courts, undermining equal protection. Reform is crucial to ensure equitable access and accountability for family court judges regarding disability rights.

No Note-Taker, No Justice: How Family Court Denies ADA Rights Read More
Adr / California / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Cps / Family Court / San Marcos Abduction Attempt

Two Schools. Two Kids. No Court Order. Why I’m Investigating a Disturbing Attempted Child Removal in San Marcos.

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

On May 1, 2025, officials from various agencies attempted to remove Giselle Smiel’s children from school without legal authorization or notification. Despite no court order and no emergencies declared, this incident highlights serious violations of parental rights and due process. An investigation has been launched to uncover the circumstances behind this alarming event.

Two Schools. Two Kids. No Court Order. Why I’m Investigating a Disturbing Attempted Child Removal in San Marcos. Read More
Adr / Family Court / Judges / New York / The Fishman Files / Uncategorized

When Judges Judge Their Own Cases: Why Recusal Rules Fail in Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In America’s family courts, the principle that no one should be a judge in their own case is often violated. The case of Marc Fishman highlights this issue, as Judge Michelle I. Schauer, with a contentious history with Fishman, asserts control over his custody case despite allegations of bias and ethical concerns, undermining judicial impartiality.

When Judges Judge Their Own Cases: Why Recusal Rules Fail in Family Court Read More
Anne Arundel County / Baltimore County / Circuit Court / Family Court / Judicial / The Reichert Files

Holy Hell, Maryland: What the Heck Is Going on in Reichert v. Hornbeck?

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

The article uncovers the troubling 15-year child custody case of Jeffrey Reichert and Sarah Hornbeck, highlighting numerous unanswered questions about parental alienation and judicial accountability. It discusses the obscurity of unpublished appellate opinions, potential corruption in Anne Arundel County courts, and the impact on the child caught in the fray.

Holy Hell, Maryland: What the Heck Is Going on in Reichert v. Hornbeck? Read More
Family Court / Judges / New York / The Fishman Files

A Father in Court Alone: The High-Stakes Struggle of Marc Fishman

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

On April 28, 2025, Marc Fishman, fighting parental alienation and suspended visitation rights in a New York courtroom, faced significant challenges: no attorney, unreceived filings, and a judge potentially biased against him. His struggle highlights flaws in the family court system, which prioritizes procedure over the welfare of vulnerable parents and children.

A Father in Court Alone: The High-Stakes Struggle of Marc Fishman Read More
California / Cps / Family Court

Miroth v. Trinity County: A Landmark Win for Families Fighting CPS Injustice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

On May 8, 2025, a California court ruled in favor of Trish Miroth against Trinity County Child Protective Services, challenging unlawful child removal. The court rejected the County’s motion to dismiss based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, affirming federal jurisdiction in civil rights cases. This landmark decision empowers families against CPS overreach.

Miroth v. Trinity County: A Landmark Win for Families Fighting CPS Injustice Read More
Baltimore City / Fiscal Spending / Government Waste / Sports

Preakness Parties on the Public Dime: Pimlico’s Rebuild and the Forgotten Cost to Taxpayers

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Maryland’s approval to modernize Pimlico Race Course, home of the Preakness Stakes, has garnered enthusiasm for potential economic benefits. However, significant taxpayer funding for politically charged parties raises concerns about transparency and equity. With residents facing fiscal challenges, there is a call for accountability to ensure fair access and responsible spending.

Preakness Parties on the Public Dime: Pimlico’s Rebuild and the Forgotten Cost to Taxpayers Read More