Parental Relocation and the Erosion of Fathers’ Rights in New York Family Court

The article by Richard Roman Shum discusses relocation rights in joint custody cases in New York. It highlights judicial discretion leading to gender bias, often favoring mothers over fathers. This approach undermines parental equality, suggesting the need for reforms that protect shared custody and ensure fair evaluations of relocation requests to maintain balanced parenting rights.

Parental Relocation and the Erosion of Fathers’ Rights in New York Family Court Read More

The Discovery Trap: How Legal Gamesmanship Bled a Father Dry in Family Court

William Sewell, representing himself in a South Carolina custody battle, encountered systemic deception and financial devastation in family court. Despite his compliance, he faced manipulation through a flawed discovery process, resulting in significant expenses and lack of proper documentation. His experience illustrates a larger issue where self-represented litigants are exploited within the legal system.

The Discovery Trap: How Legal Gamesmanship Bled a Father Dry in Family Court Read More

Juvenile Crime Surge Tests Maryland’s Promises of Reform and Rehabilitation

Maryland’s juvenile justice system is in crisis, with escalating juvenile crime and inadequate supervision leading to public safety concerns. Despite a leadership change following a critical audit, the state’s progressive rehabilitation model has failed, prioritizing offenders over victims. Effective reform must focus on accountability and community safety to regain public trust.

Juvenile Crime Surge Tests Maryland’s Promises of Reform and Rehabilitation Read More

Justice for Sale in the Palmetto State: The ‘Baby Veronica’ Case and South Carolina’s Broken Custody System

The Baby Veronica case exemplifies the flaws in South Carolina’s family court system, prioritizing profit over justice. Dusten Brown’s fight for his daughter was undermined by legal technicalities and systemic bias against Native fathers. The ruling eroded parental rights, highlighting the need for reforms to uphold fatherly rights and enforce fair adoption practices.

Justice for Sale in the Palmetto State: The ‘Baby Veronica’ Case and South Carolina’s Broken Custody System Read More

The Guardian Who Took Sides: Bias, Billing, and the Broken Role of a GAL in William Sewell’s Case

In William Sewell’s custody case, the Guardian ad Litem, Jason Wheeler, failed to maintain impartiality, favoring opposing legal counsel and neglecting serious allegations of neglect and substance abuse. His inadequate investigation and biased report raised questions about integrity in the court system, undermining trust and compromising the best interests of children.

The Guardian Who Took Sides: Bias, Billing, and the Broken Role of a GAL in William Sewell’s Case Read More

The Double Standard of Family Court: Enforcing Support, Ignoring Custody

On June 30, 2025, Maryland’s Supreme Court ruled that child support cannot be waived as it is a child’s right. This decision highlights a disparity where financial support is enforced rigorously, while custody and visitation rights for parents, particularly fathers, are often disregarded. Calls for reform emphasize equal treatment for both rights.

The Double Standard of Family Court: Enforcing Support, Ignoring Custody Read More

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman

Westchester County Family Court faces criticism over Judge Michelle Schauer’s handling of Marc Fishman’s case, who has not seen his children in five years due to alleged judicial overreach and ignored evidence of parental alienation. Despite adhering to court requirements, Fishman is denied accommodations, highlighting systemic issues and raising urgent calls for reform.

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman Read More

The Coach’s Court: The Life and Love of Jeff Reichert

Jeff Reichert’s journey from a competitive youth in Virginia Beach to an attorney and coach is marked by resilience amid personal turmoil. Despite injuries and false accusations leading to his son’s removal, Jeff remains devoted to coaching, believing in the game’s transformative power and hoping for a future reunion with his son on the court.

The Coach’s Court: The Life and Love of Jeff Reichert Read More

Open Letter: A Year and a Half of Silence — And Still No Justice

Michael Phillips shares his 18-month struggle to maintain court-ordered parenting time with his son, Dylan, facing continuous denial from the Maryland family court system. Despite fulfilling his obligations, Phillips highlights widespread issues of “paper custody,” where courts fail to enforce orders, resulting in emotional and psychological harm to children.

Open Letter: A Year and a Half of Silence — And Still No Justice Read More

“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well

The article discusses systemic corruption in South Carolina’s family courts, evidenced by William Sewell’s case, where he faces exorbitant legal fees and judicial favoritism. The judicial system protects entrenched attorneys and GALs who neglect children’s interests, silencing parents challenging unfair practices. The need for urgent judicial reform and oversight is emphasized.

“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well Read More