Investigative Journalism | Exposing What Lies Beneath
The family court system often harms children by enabling one parent to restrict access to the other, causing psychological trauma. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) increase with such estrangement, leading to long-term emotional and physical issues. Courts frequently fail to protect children from these harmful dynamics, exacerbating trauma instead of addressing it.
In 2025, the narrative emphasizes that children belong to their parents, not the government. A modern Declaration of Parental Rights asserts that parental authority is paramount, critiques the family court system, advocates for shared parenting, and calls for accountability among judges and authorities. It urges a restoration of family rights against state intervention.
The Declaration of Parental Rights: A Manifesto for Family Freedom in a Time of Overreach Read More
The 1990s courthouse construction initiative, costing $10 billion, deviated from its intended purpose, evolving into a mismanaged project favoring bureaucratic control over judicial integrity. The oversight shifted decision-making away from judges to the Administrative Office, facilitating the rise of Alternative Dispute Resolution systems that undermine constitutional rights and transparency.
Courthouses Without Courts: How a $10 Billion Construction Boondoggle Laid the Bricks for ADR Tyranny Read More
Marc Fishman, a disabled father, seeks a signed transfer order for his family court case after it was reassigned from Judge Burke to Judge Michelle Schauer without documentation. Despite multiple requests, the court has not provided clarity, raising concerns about judicial misconduct, ADA violations, and lack of due process for pro se litigants.
No Order, No Appeal: The Quiet Corruption of Judge-Shopping in Westchester Family Court Read More
New Jersey Senate Bill S-4510 aims to prioritize children’s preferences in custody disputes and require evidence for reunification therapy, facing opposition from matrimonial lawyers concerned about profit loss. Critics argue it challenges the current system’s control and accountability, emphasizing the need for children’s voices in family court decisions and reforming the legal framework.
When Custody Reform Threatens Profits, the Legal Industry Panics Read More
Miranda Rights extend beyond criminal arrests to family court, which can threaten personal liberty and finances. Individuals facing inquiries about finances may invoke the Fifth Amendment to protect against self-incrimination. With no constitutional safeguards, understanding one’s rights in family court is essential, as the implications can be severe and life-altering.
You Have the Right to Remain Silent—Yes, Even in Family Court Read More
They call it family law, but the only thing it truly governs is separation, silence, and suffering. This is not justice — it’s bureaucracy weaponized against love. In a system where judges hide behind opinion and immunity, where money decides custody, and where the Constitution is conveniently ignored, we must ask: who benefits from this chaos? Certainly not the children. Not the parents. Only the lawyers, the evaluators, the GALs, and the judges padding their pensions. The time has come to stop reforming family court — and start abolishing it.
Op-Ed: The Hypocrisy of Family Law — Why Family Court Should Be Abolished Read MoreWhat is the price of your child? In family court, it’s whatever the system can extract—through legal fees, child support orders, court-mandated services, and endless litigation. This isn’t justice. It’s a billion-dollar industry built on your heartbreak. Behind every “best interest of the child” ruling lies a profit motive no one wants to talk about. Until now.
The Price of Your Child: How Family Court Became a Billion-Dollar Industry Read MoreThe child support enforcement system, often seen as protective, is critiqued for being a profit-driven network. It utilizes administrative measures bypassing judicial oversight, leading to punitive actions against struggling parents. This system, enriched by corporate contractors, harms families, particularly fathers, while demanding reform for transparency and due process.
The Business of Broken Families: How Corporations Profit from Child Support Enforcement Read MoreFamily court in the U.S. operates differently from criminal courts, lacking essential rights like the presumption of innocence and a jury. False allegations are common, leading to unjust outcomes. The burden of proof lies with the accused, and mental health issues are weaponized against parents. Reforms are urgently needed to ensure fairness and due process.
Innocent Until Family Court: How Due Process Dies Behind Closed Doors Read More