The Platform That Censors the Truth: How Medium Betrayed Its Writers and Silenced My Journalism

Since 2020, journalist Michael Phillips used Medium as a platform for impactful writing on systemic injustice. After building a loyal audience and gaining traction, his account was suspended without explanation for supposedly violating rules. He criticizes Medium’s censorship as corporate control over journalism, urging a move to platforms that uphold free speech.

The Platform That Censors the Truth: How Medium Betrayed Its Writers and Silenced My Journalism Read More

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case

The Sewell v. Sewell case illustrates a troubling pattern within the South Carolina Family Court, where twelve motions filed by William Sewell seeking justice were uniformly denied without adequate explanation. This systemic denial of due process highlights a court environment prioritizing power over fairness, leaving vulnerable parties without legal recourse or representation.

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case Read More

Silenced Without Cause: How Medium Is Failing Journalists and Censoring Investigative Reporting

Michael Phillips highlights the troubling suspension of his journalism account by Medium without clarity on policy violations. He argues that the platform’s vague moderation policies threaten accountability, particularly for independent journalists. Medium’s practices risk censoring vital investigative work, raising concerns about digital publishing’s commitment to free speech and transparency.

Silenced Without Cause: How Medium Is Failing Journalists and Censoring Investigative Reporting Read More

When the Court Punishes the Cry for Help: Why Speaking Out Isn’t Contempt — It’s Courage

The family court system often prioritizes secrecy and power over justice, leaving parents feeling unheard and desperate. When they speak out, it’s typically to expose serious concerns about child safety. Instead of being punished, these parents should be supported, as their pleas indicate systemic failures that threaten their children’s well-being.

When the Court Punishes the Cry for Help: Why Speaking Out Isn’t Contempt — It’s Courage Read More

The Double Standard of Family Court: Enforcing Support, Ignoring Custody

On June 30, 2025, Maryland’s Supreme Court ruled that child support cannot be waived as it is a child’s right. This decision highlights a disparity where financial support is enforced rigorously, while custody and visitation rights for parents, particularly fathers, are often disregarded. Calls for reform emphasize equal treatment for both rights.

The Double Standard of Family Court: Enforcing Support, Ignoring Custody Read More

A Second Declaration: How the Family Court Crisis Mirrors the Reasons We Fought for Independence

The article by Michael Phillips argues that modern family courts in the U.S. mirror the injustices of colonial rule, stripping parents of rights and imposing financial burdens without representation. It highlights issues of autonomy, accountability, and exploitation, urging a movement for reform to restore parental rights and challenge the corrupt judicial system.

A Second Declaration: How the Family Court Crisis Mirrors the Reasons We Fought for Independence Read More

The Summerville Syndicate: How a South Carolina Family Court Became a Playground for Power, Profit, and Persecution

Families in South Carolina allege systemic abuse within the family court system, implicating judges and attorneys like Mandy Kimmons and Donnie Gamache in racketeering. Whistleblowers describe coercion, financial exploitation, and collusion among legal and political insiders, raising calls for federal intervention to address these disturbing patterns of misconduct and silence.

The Summerville Syndicate: How a South Carolina Family Court Became a Playground for Power, Profit, and Persecution Read More

Victory for Parents: Supreme Court’s Mahmoud v. Taylor Ruling Reaffirms Parental Rights and Religious Liberty

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Mahmoud v. Taylor, affirming parents’ rights to direct their children’s moral and religious upbringing within public education. The decision mandates schools to respect religious objections and ensure transparency in curricula. This landmark ruling signifies a new era for parental authority in education across the country.

Victory for Parents: Supreme Court’s Mahmoud v. Taylor Ruling Reaffirms Parental Rights and Religious Liberty Read More

🚨 Substack Just Silenced a Journalist. Who’s Next?

The article discusses the suspension of journalist Richard Luthmann from Substack after he published investigative pieces on political corruption. It criticizes Substack’s failure to uphold its free speech promises by yielding to online mob pressure. The piece warns that silencing independent voices endangers press freedom and democracy at large.

🚨 Substack Just Silenced a Journalist. Who’s Next? Read More

Every Motion Denied: A Father’s Day Message from the Broken Heart of Maryland Family Court

In Montgomery County, Maryland, a father has been unable to see his son since January 2024 due to the Circuit Court’s refusal to enforce a court order. Despite filing around 100 motions requesting enforcement and accommodations for disabilities, all efforts were ignored or denied, reflecting systemic neglect of fathers’ rights within the family court system.

Every Motion Denied: A Father’s Day Message from the Broken Heart of Maryland Family Court Read More