Tag: Separation Of Powers
Executive / Federal / Federal Court / Government / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Middle-Ground Earthquake: How the Supreme Court’s Trump v. Slaughter Transcript Reveals a Quietly Radical Plan for the Administrative State

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court’s deliberation in Trump v. Slaughter suggests a strategic ruling that may preserve the name of Humphrey’s Executor while limiting its impact. This could redefine agency independence and empower presidents to dismiss officials without judicial remedy, fundamentally altering the relationship between the presidency and administrative agencies, with significant long-term implications.

The Middle-Ground Earthquake: How the Supreme Court’s Trump v. Slaughter Transcript Reveals a Quietly Radical Plan for the Administrative State Read More
Constitutional Law / Federal Court / Judicial / Policy / Politics / Supreme Court

Trump v. Slaughter: The Supreme Court Case That Could Rewire Presidential Power — and America’s System of Administrative Justice Along With It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court case Trump v. Slaughter threatens the independence of various regulatory agencies by potentially overturning the precedent set by Humphrey’s Executor. The outcome could grant presidents at-will removal authority over agency commissioners, reshape administrative courts, and diminish judicial oversight, leading to increased regulatory uncertainty and political influence over enforcement actions.

Trump v. Slaughter: The Supreme Court Case That Could Rewire Presidential Power — and America’s System of Administrative Justice Along With It Read More
Federal / Federal Court / Government

3rd Circuit Rebukes White House: Alina Habba Was Illegally Installed as U.S. Attorney — And the Fallout Could Be Massive

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Alina Habba unlawfully served as the U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, invalidating her actions since July 2025. This decision highlights significant constitutional concerns regarding federal appointments, emphasizing the judiciary’s role in upholding statutory limits and ensuring justice is not politicized.

3rd Circuit Rebukes White House: Alina Habba Was Illegally Installed as U.S. Attorney — And the Fallout Could Be Massive Read More
Constitutional Law / Government / Government / Government Reform / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Great Constitutional Correction: How Courts Are Re-Drawing the Lines of Power

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Recent court cases across the U.S. are reshaping governmental authority, challenging the power dynamics between Congress, the President, and unelected agencies. The Rhode Island case signifies a judicial push to restore constitutional balance by questioning executive overreach and emergency powers. This movement aims to reestablish accountability within American governance structures.

The Great Constitutional Correction: How Courts Are Re-Drawing the Lines of Power Read More
bias / Constitutional Law / Donald Trump / Executive / History / Legal History / News & Media / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Trump, Presidential Power, and Politico’s Short Memory

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Politico article discusses Donald Trump’s second term and his legal battles over executive power but questions whether his actions are truly unprecedented. It argues that past presidents have similarly expanded powers but without the same scrutiny. The real concern, it suggests, stems from Trump’s lack of political approval, not constitutional violation.

Trump, Presidential Power, and Politico’s Short Memory Read More
Constitutional Law / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / Laws / Opinion / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In a significant opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett criticized Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in Trump v. CASA, Inc., highlighting the dangers of judicial overreach and the role of courts. She emphasized that judges must interpret the law, not legislate, marking a crucial boundary for future judicial conduct.

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court Read More
Government / Government / Judges / Judicial / Maryland / Politics

Trump Administration Strikes Back: Lawsuit Targets Entire Maryland Federal Bench Over Deportation Delay

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit against Maryland’s federal judges, accusing them of judicial overreach for delaying deportation proceedings. The move aims to assert executive authority over immigration enforcement and deter other courts from similar actions. Critics argue this could lead to ideological interference in immigration policy.

Trump Administration Strikes Back: Lawsuit Targets Entire Maryland Federal Bench Over Deportation Delay Read More
Taxes

Trump’s Tax Bill Sparks Outcry Over Provision Undermining Judicial Authority

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” has sparked controversy for a provision limiting federal courts’ ability to enforce contempt citations against the government. Critics argue this undermines judicial authority and could impact ongoing cases. The bill has passed the House and now moves to the Senate, with further debate anticipated.

Trump’s Tax Bill Sparks Outcry Over Provision Undermining Judicial Authority Read More