Home » Maryland Courts » Page 2

Justice Cannot Be Blind to Invisible Disabilities

Maryland courts are increasingly denying ADA accommodation requests for individuals with invisible disabilities, leading to severe consequences. Judges are making medical determinations without proper evaluations, overshadowing federal law. This systemic failure calls for reforms including empowered ADA coordinators, necessary written responses, independent oversight, and better judicial training to honor ADA rights effectively.

Justice Cannot Be Blind to Invisible Disabilities Read More

The Disabilities You Don’t See — and the Systems That Still Don’t See Us

The article addresses the plight of individuals with invisible disabilities in America, highlighting systemic bias in courts and workplaces. Despite the ADA’s provisions, many face barriers due to outdated perceptions and bureaucratic inefficiencies, resulting in detrimental outcomes. Advocates emphasize the need for better enforcement and understanding of these disabilities.

The Disabilities You Don’t See — and the Systems That Still Don’t See Us Read More

So You Want to Be a Maryland Magistrate? A Step-by-Step Guide to Letting Criminals Run Free

The content critiques the ease of becoming a magistrate in Maryland without a law degree or passing the bar exam. It highlights the absurdity of allowing unqualified individuals to make critical legal decisions, emphasizing the potential dangers of this system, where accountability is negligible and public safety is compromised.

So You Want to Be a Maryland Magistrate? A Step-by-Step Guide to Letting Criminals Run Free Read More

Maryland’s “No-Law-Degree-Required” Magistrates: Because Why Should Justice Require Actual Lawyers?

In Maryland, individuals without law degrees or bar licenses can become magistrates, thus wielding significant judicial power. This alarming practice allows untrained people to make critical decisions regarding violent offenders, compromising public safety. Such a system raises serious concerns about the qualifications required for roles that impact lives and communities.

Maryland’s “No-Law-Degree-Required” Magistrates: Because Why Should Justice Require Actual Lawyers? Read More

Montgomery County Circuit Court: Where Poverty and Fatherhood Are Crimes

Montgomery County Circuit Court, often seen as progressive, demonstrates systemic bias against fathers, particularly those without wealth. Many fathers face secret hearings, financial exploitation, and weaponized protective orders, leading to severe emotional and financial distress. This issue reflects a broader trend in family courts, where justice for fathers is increasingly rare.

Montgomery County Circuit Court: Where Poverty and Fatherhood Are Crimes Read More

Op-Ed: The Hypocrisy of Family Law — Why Family Court Should Be Abolished

They call it family law, but the only thing it truly governs is separation, silence, and suffering. This is not justice — it’s bureaucracy weaponized against love. In a system where judges hide behind opinion and immunity, where money decides custody, and where the Constitution is conveniently ignored, we must ask: who benefits from this chaos? Certainly not the children. Not the parents. Only the lawyers, the evaluators, the GALs, and the judges padding their pensions. The time has come to stop reforming family court — and start abolishing it.

Op-Ed: The Hypocrisy of Family Law — Why Family Court Should Be Abolished Read More

Democrats Outraged Over One Arrest — But Where Was Their Outrage for the Rest of Us?

The arrest of Senator Alex Padilla during a protest has sparked outrage among Democrats, with Representative Jamie Raskin condemning it as authoritarian. However, Maryland veteran Jeff Reichert highlights hypocrisy, recalling his own wrongful arrests amid silence from the party. He emphasizes that justice should apply universally, not just for political gain.

Democrats Outraged Over One Arrest — But Where Was Their Outrage for the Rest of Us? Read More

“Justice on Hold”: Maryland Court Puts Child Victims Act Cases on Pause Amid System Mismanagement

A Baltimore judge has paused over 1,250 civil child sexual abuse cases under the 2023 Child Victims Act, revealing the court’s lack of preparedness for the influx of lawsuits. Critics blame state leaders for failing to provide necessary resources, leaving survivors in limbo and raising concerns about the justice system’s effectiveness.

“Justice on Hold”: Maryland Court Puts Child Victims Act Cases on Pause Amid System Mismanagement Read More

A Voice for Justice: How Jeff Reichert Turned to an ADA Advocate to Defend His Rights and Protect His Son

Jeff Reichert has engaged an independent ADA advocate, Janice Wolk Grenadier, to address alleged discrimination and procedural failures in his custody battle. Her letter calls for judicial accountability, an investigation into jurisdictional misconduct, enforcement of past court orders, and safeguarding the rights of both Grant and Jeff during a flawed legal process.

A Voice for Justice: How Jeff Reichert Turned to an ADA Advocate to Defend His Rights and Protect His Son Read More

The Case Maryland Wants to Bury: Inside Reichert v. Hornbeck

The Reichert v. Hornbeck case details a father’s arduous battle for custody over his son, marked by systemic biases and legal obstacles. Jeff Reichert’s parental rights were revoked without appropriate justification, exacerbated by the Maryland judiciary’s refusal to publicly document critical rulings. This case highlights alarming issues within family law and judicial transparency.

The Case Maryland Wants to Bury: Inside Reichert v. Hornbeck Read More