Tag: family court reform
Accountability / Adr / Child Custody / Child Custody / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / parental rights

“Unwitting Accomplices” — How Schools, Doctors, and Coaches Get Pulled Into Custody Wars Without Realizing It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The article by Michael Phillips discusses how third parties, including schools, doctors, and coaches, often unknowingly contribute to parental alienation during custody disputes. It highlights how one parent manipulates the narrative, sidelining the other, leading to significant psychological harm to children and the excluded parent. Awareness and education are vital for change.

“Unwitting Accomplices” — How Schools, Doctors, and Coaches Get Pulled Into Custody Wars Without Realizing It Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Court Reform / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Mental Health

How Family Courts Are Ignoring the Trauma They Create: Every Denied Parent Is an Extra ACE Score for a Child

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system often harms children by enabling one parent to restrict access to the other, causing psychological trauma. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) increase with such estrangement, leading to long-term emotional and physical issues. Courts frequently fail to protect children from these harmful dynamics, exacerbating trauma instead of addressing it.

How Family Courts Are Ignoring the Trauma They Create: Every Denied Parent Is an Extra ACE Score for a Child Read More
Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Court Reform / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Laws / parental rights / Policy / Politics / Rights and Freedoms / transparency

The Declaration of Parental Rights: A Manifesto for Family Freedom in a Time of Overreach

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In 2025, the narrative emphasizes that children belong to their parents, not the government. A modern Declaration of Parental Rights asserts that parental authority is paramount, critiques the family court system, advocates for shared parenting, and calls for accountability among judges and authorities. It urges a restoration of family rights against state intervention.

The Declaration of Parental Rights: A Manifesto for Family Freedom in a Time of Overreach Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Mental Health / parental rights / The Corruption Series

When They Steal Your Children: How to Still Feel Like a Parent in a System That Wants You to Disappear

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The content discusses the emotional turmoil faced by parents who feel erased by family court decisions. It emphasizes that despite these challenges, they remain parents. Suggestions include writing letters to their children, preserving memories, speaking their names, and finding support. The piece encourages resilience, self-improvement, and turning grief into positive actions.

When They Steal Your Children: How to Still Feel Like a Parent in a System That Wants You to Disappear Read More
Uncategorized

Justice for Sale? The Uncomfortable Truth Behind Family Court Corruption

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system, once a protective space for children, faces criticism for being corrupt, biased, and profit-driven. Secrecy, judicial discretion, and financial incentives create an environment where misconduct flourishes, harming vulnerable families. Reform advocates urge measures like transparency, independent oversight, and fair custody practices to safeguard children’s interests and restore trust.

Justice for Sale? The Uncomfortable Truth Behind Family Court Corruption Read More
Accountability / Ada Accommodations / Advocacy / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / Citizens Services / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Family Court / Laws

35 Years of the ADA: A Civil Rights Law in Name, Not in Practice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Next week marks 35 years since the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed, yet many disabled Americans still face discrimination and unfulfilled promises. Both past and current administrations have failed to enforce ADA rights, leaving systemic issues unaddressed. Real change is needed beyond symbolic gestures to ensure equal treatment and accountability.

35 Years of the ADA: A Civil Rights Law in Name, Not in Practice Read More
Accountability / Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Child Support / Child Support / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Federal Funding / Government / Government Corruption / Legal History / Money and Finance / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / The Corruption Series / Washington, DC

The Fall of ADR: How the Supreme Court’s 2025 Rulings Exposed the Unconstitutional Rise of Shadow Justice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

On July 14, 2025, the Supreme Court rulings in Trump v. J.G.G. and Kennedy v. Braidwood dismantled the legal framework of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), declaring only Article III courts can issue binding decisions. This has led to a crisis in state courts, exposing potentially void past rulings and requiring significant judicial reform.

The Fall of ADR: How the Supreme Court’s 2025 Rulings Exposed the Unconstitutional Rise of Shadow Justice Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Civil Rights / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Equality & Equal Opportunity / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Judges / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms / South Carolina / South Carolina Watch / The Corruption Series

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The article critiques the unfair trial experienced by William Sewell in a South Carolina family court. It outlines the essential legal safeguards denied to him, such as a neutral judge, access to counsel, equitable discovery, and protection from retaliation. Without these safeguards, the article argues, due process is compromised for self-represented parents across America.

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial? Read More
2026 Election Cycle / 2026 Elections Cycle / Accountability / Advocacy / Campaigns / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / elections / Family Court / Family Court Reform / GOP / Government / Government / Governor / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Politics

“Who’s Protecting the Children?”: John Myrick Calls for Family Court Investigation in Maryland

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Maryland, gubernatorial candidate John Myrick criticizes the family court system, arguing it’s corrupt and favors financial interests over children’s welfare. He highlights how Title IV-D funding exacerbates conflicts of interest, denying parental rights and causing family separation. Myrick calls for oversight reforms to enhance accountability and protect all parents’ rights.

“Who’s Protecting the Children?”: John Myrick Calls for Family Court Investigation in Maryland Read More
Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Civil Rights / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms / South Carolina / South Carolina Watch / The Corruption Series

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Sewell v. Sewell case illustrates a troubling pattern within the South Carolina Family Court, where twelve motions filed by William Sewell seeking justice were uniformly denied without adequate explanation. This systemic denial of due process highlights a court environment prioritizing power over fairness, leaving vulnerable parties without legal recourse or representation.

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case Read More