Home » Due Process » Page 5

Trojan Justice: How Turner v. Rogers Gutted Due Process and Smuggled ADR Into the 14th Amendment

In Turner v. Rogers, the Supreme Court prioritized administrative efficiency over due process, allowing child support enforcement without legal counsel or proper hearings. This ruling disguised as a protective measure paved the way for administrative control, redefining justice as procedural checklists, compromising parental rights, and undermining constitutional protections.

Trojan Justice: How Turner v. Rogers Gutted Due Process and Smuggled ADR Into the 14th Amendment Read More

Double Standard: Why a Cop Keeps His Pension While a Disabled Dad Loses His Children

The article discusses the stark disparity in the justice system of New Rochelle, New York, exemplified by Officer Lane Schlesinger, who, despite a history of misconduct, enjoys a full pension, while Marc Fishman, a disabled father wrongfully arrested, has faced years of separation from his children and continuous injustices. This highlights systemic failures and erosion of public trust.

Double Standard: Why a Cop Keeps His Pension While a Disabled Dad Loses His Children Read More

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out

William Sewell faces dire consequences following the Family Court of Dorchester County’s ruling granting custody of his daughter to his ex-wife, imposing significant financial burdens, and denying him legal representation. Despite these challenges, he pursues two post-judgment motions, arguing judicial bias and constitutional violations, determined to fight for his rights and child.

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out Read More

The Declaration of Parental Rights: A Manifesto for Family Freedom in a Time of Overreach

In 2025, the narrative emphasizes that children belong to their parents, not the government. A modern Declaration of Parental Rights asserts that parental authority is paramount, critiques the family court system, advocates for shared parenting, and calls for accountability among judges and authorities. It urges a restoration of family rights against state intervention.

The Declaration of Parental Rights: A Manifesto for Family Freedom in a Time of Overreach Read More

The Mica Adler Case: How Overreach and Ideology in Maine’s Child Welfare System Break Families Apart

When a jury clears a mother of abuse charges and even the state drops its case—yet she still can’t regain custody of her son—you’re no longer looking at justice. You’re looking at ideology disguised as protection. The Mica Adler case reveals how Maine’s child welfare system punishes poverty, out-of-the-box parenting, and nonconformity while failing to prioritize real child safety. It’s not about the best interests of the child—it’s about obedience to a bureaucratic standard.

The Mica Adler Case: How Overreach and Ideology in Maine’s Child Welfare System Break Families Apart Read More

The Fall of ADR: How the Supreme Court’s 2025 Rulings Exposed the Unconstitutional Rise of Shadow Justice

On July 14, 2025, the Supreme Court rulings in Trump v. J.G.G. and Kennedy v. Braidwood dismantled the legal framework of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), declaring only Article III courts can issue binding decisions. This has led to a crisis in state courts, exposing potentially void past rulings and requiring significant judicial reform.

The Fall of ADR: How the Supreme Court’s 2025 Rulings Exposed the Unconstitutional Rise of Shadow Justice Read More

Hijacked Justice: How Federal Funding Turned Family Court into a Profit Machine

The family court system has undergone a deliberate transformation over decades, driven by federal funding that incentivizes revenue generation from private disputes. Laws like Title IV-D and PRWORA have turned courts into profit-driven entities, prioritizing efficiency over justice and resulting in systemic bias against noncustodial parents, primarily fathers.

Hijacked Justice: How Federal Funding Turned Family Court into a Profit Machine Read More

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial?

The article critiques the unfair trial experienced by William Sewell in a South Carolina family court. It outlines the essential legal safeguards denied to him, such as a neutral judge, access to counsel, equitable discovery, and protection from retaliation. Without these safeguards, the article argues, due process is compromised for self-represented parents across America.

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial? Read More

Courthouses Without Courts: How a $10 Billion Construction Boondoggle Laid the Bricks for ADR Tyranny

The 1990s courthouse construction initiative, costing $10 billion, deviated from its intended purpose, evolving into a mismanaged project favoring bureaucratic control over judicial integrity. The oversight shifted decision-making away from judges to the Administrative Office, facilitating the rise of Alternative Dispute Resolution systems that undermine constitutional rights and transparency.

Courthouses Without Courts: How a $10 Billion Construction Boondoggle Laid the Bricks for ADR Tyranny Read More