By Michael Phillips
On June 24, 2025, the mask finally slipped.
Testifying before the House Oversight Committee in a closed-door hearing, Neera Tanden—former White House Staff Secretary and longtime head of the Center for American Progress (CAP)—admitted to directing the use of the President’s autopen. For nearly two years, she was in charge of managing the flow of documents to and from President Biden, including overseeing the mechanical process that signed executive orders, letters, and possibly even laws in his name.
This wasn’t a clerical formality.
This was governance by proxy.
At a time when President Biden’s mental acuity was already under scrutiny, Neera Tanden was the one signing—or directing the signature of—presidential documents. She didn’t just shuffle paperwork. She authorized the autopen’s use. And in her own words, she doesn’t know who gave final approval.
Let that sink in.
WTF Is an Autopen?
If this is the first time you’re hearing the word “autopen,” you’re not alone — most Americans didn’t know such a device even existed, let alone that it could be used to sign laws and presidential pardons.
So what is it?
An autopen is a mechanical signature machine — a device that reproduces a person’s signature using a programmed template and a robotic arm. Think of it like a very fancy stamp, only it can sign “Joe Biden” onto official documents without Biden actually being in the room — or awake.
Originally designed for busy officials to sign mass correspondence or routine documents, the autopen was never meant to be a tool for governing. But in the modern White House, it became exactly that: a quiet, untraceable way to give legal effect to executive power without the President ever lifting a pen.
The problem? Under Article II of the U.S. Constitution, only the President can execute certain acts — like signing bills into law, issuing pardons, or declaring emergencies.
When an unelected staffer like Neera Tanden directs the autopen to “sign” on Biden’s behalf, she’s effectively standing in for the Commander-in-Chief.
And that’s not just sketchy — it’s potentially unconstitutional.
And here’s the kicker: the courts have never directly ruled on whether this kind of autopen use is legal for serious executive actions. Congress has let it slide. The media ignored it — until now.
Who Was Actually Running the Country?
Tanden’s testimony came as part of an ongoing investigation into whether President Biden remained mentally fit to discharge the duties of the office—and who may have been exercising executive authority on his behalf.
She confirmed that from October 2021 to May 2023, during her tenure as White House Staff Secretary, she was authorized to direct autopen usage for “certain categories” of documents. These included executive orders, proclamations, and other matters of public policy. Incredibly, she testified that she did not know who gave final clearance for some of these signatures—effectively admitting there was no transparent chain of command.
This wasn’t the military signing routine authorizations. This was the Office of the President, with his signature going out under someone else’s discretion.
The Real Crisis: Mental Acuity Meets Political Automation
Tanden insists there was no wrongdoing. She claimed she followed an “inherited process,” sent memos to Biden’s advisors, and acted according to protocol. But that only raises more questions:
- Was President Biden directly involved in reviewing all autopen-signed orders?
- Who else had authority to greenlight the autopen?
- If no one knows who finalized decisions, how can the White House claim Biden was in command?
The fact that this testimony was part of a congressional inquiry into Biden’s mental competence makes the situation more serious—not less. If the autopen system operated as a workaround for a disengaged or incapacitated president, we are in uncharted constitutional waters.
The NGO Cartel: A Closed-Loop Power Structure
Neera Tanden didn’t come from a neutral background. She ran the Center for American Progress, one of the most powerful liberal think tanks in Washington, known for churning out policy memos that conveniently become Democratic talking points, regulations, and now—presidential directives.
She left the White House in 2023… and now she’s back as President and CEO of CAP, the very think tank that shaped much of Biden’s domestic policy. CAP lobbies the government, sues political opponents, writes policy, and staffs the administration. And now we know it signs for the president, too.
This is not a conspiracy theory. It’s an open power loop:
- CAP makes the policy,
- CAP staff enter government,
- CAP alumni approve the president’s signature,
- CAP benefits from the laws that follow.
The St. Croix Pardons: Executive Power on Vacation
The scandal exploded when House Oversight Chair James Comer revealed a direct paper trail linking Neera Tanden to six presidential pardons issued on December 30, 2022, while President Biden was vacationing in St. Croix. These pardons—including some tied to political donors and controversial convictions—were reportedly autopen-signed under Tanden’s direction.
In short: the President was on a golf course. Neera Tanden was signing pardons.
And nobody can say who, if anyone, gave final legal clearance.
This single incident reveals the broader abuse: mechanical governance by proxy, where the elected president is neither seen nor heard—just silently “signed.”
After Tanden: Who’s Holding the Pen Now?
When Tanden transitioned to lead the White House Domestic Policy Council in May 2023, the autopen baton likely passed to her successor as Staff Secretary. Though not publicly confirmed, reports point to Stephanie Feldman, a Biden confidant and former gun policy advisor, as having stepped into the role.
Was Feldman also authorized to use the autopen? Did she follow the same unclear process? Congress needs to find out.
Transparency Demands Investigation
Regardless of whether Biden was technically “informed,” Tanden’s own admission reveals a system that lacks safeguards, documentation, and democratic accountability.
The American people deserve answers. Now.
Congress should immediately:
- 🔍 Subpoena the full autopen log from 2021–2025
- 🧾 Demand testimony from Tanden, Feldman, and Biden advisors under oath
- 📋 Audit which documents were autopen-signed, and who initiated each one
- ⚖️ Investigate the broader role of partisan think tanks in directing executive action
If unelected NGO insiders are signing for the President—or worse, governing in his name—the American people have a right to know.
Final Word: We Didn’t Elect Neera Tanden
The Constitution does not grant executive authority to a staff secretary or think tank consultant. Yet for nearly two years, Neera Tanden functionally acted as a gatekeeper of presidential power—and now leads an organization that profits politically and financially from the very policies she helped sign into law.
Let’s not forget: even Biden’s own party rejected Neera Tanden for a Cabinet post in 2021. Her nomination to lead the Office of Management and Budget was shot down by a Democrat-controlled Senate over concerns about her temperament and partisanship. Yet somehow, she still wound up greenlighting presidential pardons, directing executive orders, and helping run the country.
Whether it was through complacency, incapacity, or calculated convenience, the Biden administration allowed the reins of power to drift into the hands of unelected partisans.
If Joe Biden wasn’t governing…
Who was?
#UnelectedPresident #NeeraTanden #AutopenScandal #CAPCartel #ExecutiveOverreach #BidenMentalFitness #DeepState #DomesticPolicyCouncil #WhiteHouseTransparency #WhoSignedIt
Discover more from RIPTIDE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
