Home » access to justice » Page 2

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case

William Sewell, a South Carolina father, faces potential incarceration over unpaid child support and a hefty guardian ad litem fee. His case raises due process concerns, particularly regarding the right to legal counsel as outlined in Turner v. Rogers. This situation highlights systemic injustices towards indigent parents in family courts across the U.S.

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case Read More

Paralyzed by Procedure: How Family Court Turns Technicalities Into Injustice

Family court in New York often prioritizes procedural technicalities over truth, resulting in devastating consequences for parents like Marc Fishman, who struggles for access to his children due to bureaucratic failures. The system frequently dismisses claims based on flawed processes, not factual inaccuracies, highlighting an urgent need for reform to restore fair access to justice.

Paralyzed by Procedure: How Family Court Turns Technicalities Into Injustice Read More

Justice for Sale: How ADR Courts Hijacked Due Process and Made You Pay for It

The post critiques the shift from traditional courts, which uphold justice as a constitutional right, to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) systems that charge for legal services, undermining due process. It highlights court cases emphasizing access to justice without fees and calls for reform to restore constitutional rights and challenge the financial burden placed on litigants.

Justice for Sale: How ADR Courts Hijacked Due Process and Made You Pay for It Read More

Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court

Family court often prioritizes wealth over justice, creating socioeconomic bias against those who cannot afford legal representation or services. This leads to systemic disadvantages for low-income litigants, impacting their ability to advocate for their children’s best interests. Strategies exist for pro se litigants to combat these inequalities and seek fair treatment.

Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court Read More

⚖️ Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court

Family court often exhibits socioeconomic bias, favoring wealthier litigants and undermining those without financial resources. This bias can lead to dire consequences for lower-income parents, affecting their ability to secure fair hearings and maintain relationships with their children. Advocating for equal treatment and reform in the judiciary is crucial for justice.

⚖️ Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court Read More