Double Dipping Isn’t Just Maryland’s Problem – The National Pattern of Replacing Parents While Still Charging Support

In Maryland, courts permit a “de facto father” to replace the biological parent while still enforcing child support obligations, highlighting a troubling trend in family courts nationwide. This practice benefits states financially, creating a system where parental rights are diminished yet financial obligations persist, often under the guise of the child’s best interests.

Double Dipping Isn’t Just Maryland’s Problem – The National Pattern of Replacing Parents While Still Charging Support Read More

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence

In Reichert v. Hornbeck, the Circuit Court has created a dangerous legal precedent by granting John H. Michel parental standing without any legal justification or consideration of the child’s wishes. This ruling threatens the rights of fit biological parents in Maryland, allowing judges to grant parental status to unrelated third parties arbitrarily.

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence Read More

The Judge Who’s Missing: Why Family Courts Fail Without the Right Bench

The family court system is failing due to inadequate judges lacking neutrality, knowledge, and accountability. This leads to injustice, where truth is overlooked, and biases prevail. To reform the system, ongoing education for judges, public oversight, and independent accountability boards are essential. Justice for families is compromised until ideal judges are established.

The Judge Who’s Missing: Why Family Courts Fail Without the Right Bench Read More

The Evidence They Ignored: How Judge Maurice Williams Buried the Truth in Marc Fishman’s Case

Marc Fishman, exonerated by New York officials for child abuse allegations, faces potential jail time from Judge Maurice Williams despite exculpatory evidence being withheld. A supervised visit confirmed by a court-appointed supervisor supports Fishman’s innocence, highlighting issues in the judicial system that seem to silence evidence conflicting with prior rulings.

The Evidence They Ignored: How Judge Maurice Williams Buried the Truth in Marc Fishman’s Case Read More

Maryland’s Family Courts Are Failing Families: Here’s Why Reform Can’t Wait

Maryland’s family courts, intended to support families in crisis, have become burdensome and inefficient, often harming those they aim to protect. Overwhelmed by caseloads, biased practices, and financial barriers, these courts fail to prioritize children’s needs. Systemic reforms are necessary for accountability and transparency, urging public advocacy for meaningful change.

Maryland’s Family Courts Are Failing Families: Here’s Why Reform Can’t Wait Read More

10 Ways Family Courts Hide Misconduct: A Deep Dive into the Shadows of Justice

Family courts often fail to act in the best interests of children and families, enabling misconduct by judges and legal actors. Techniques such as sealing records, reframing misconduct, and dismissing pro se litigant motions compromise justice. Without accountability, family courts protect themselves rather than serving families, necessitating demands for transparency and oversight.

10 Ways Family Courts Hide Misconduct: A Deep Dive into the Shadows of Justice Read More

From the Bench to the Bully Pulpit: Judge Mandy Kimmons and the Breakdown of Impartiality in Sewell’s Trial

In South Carolina, Judge Mandy Kimmons allegedly failed to provide impartiality in a custody case, exhibiting bias and misconduct that compromised William Sewell’s right to a fair trial. Accounts reveal Kimmons’ hostility, procedural unfairness, and retaliation against Sewell, raising concerns about her adherence to judicial conduct standards and judicial integrity.

From the Bench to the Bully Pulpit: Judge Mandy Kimmons and the Breakdown of Impartiality in Sewell’s Trial Read More

Judges for Sale: The Quiet Power of ADR and the Revolving Door

The family court system’s reliance on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has turned justice into a for-profit enterprise, often forcing parents into mediation without considering safety or power dynamics. Retired judges transition into mediation roles, profiting from a system they once controlled, raising ethical concerns and perpetuating cycles of abuse and conflict.

Judges for Sale: The Quiet Power of ADR and the Revolving Door Read More

The Guardian Who Took Sides: Bias, Billing, and the Broken Role of a GAL in William Sewell’s Case

In William Sewell’s custody case, the Guardian ad Litem, Jason Wheeler, failed to maintain impartiality, favoring opposing legal counsel and neglecting serious allegations of neglect and substance abuse. His inadequate investigation and biased report raised questions about integrity in the court system, undermining trust and compromising the best interests of children.

The Guardian Who Took Sides: Bias, Billing, and the Broken Role of a GAL in William Sewell’s Case Read More

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman

Westchester County Family Court faces criticism over Judge Michelle Schauer’s handling of Marc Fishman’s case, who has not seen his children in five years due to alleged judicial overreach and ignored evidence of parental alienation. Despite adhering to court requirements, Fishman is denied accommodations, highlighting systemic issues and raising urgent calls for reform.

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman Read More