The Quiet Coup: How ADR Replaced the Constitution and No One Voted for It

By Michael Phillips In a sharp and carefully phrased academic critique, Professor Eric Yamamoto confirms what many legal reformers have long suspected: the American justice system has been quietly hijacked. …

The Quiet Coup: How ADR Replaced the Constitution and No One Voted for It Read More

Silenced Without Cause: How Medium Is Failing Journalists and Censoring Investigative Reporting

Michael Phillips highlights the troubling suspension of his journalism account by Medium without clarity on policy violations. He argues that the platform’s vague moderation policies threaten accountability, particularly for independent journalists. Medium’s practices risk censoring vital investigative work, raising concerns about digital publishing’s commitment to free speech and transparency.

Silenced Without Cause: How Medium Is Failing Journalists and Censoring Investigative Reporting Read More

A Second Declaration: How the Family Court Crisis Mirrors the Reasons We Fought for Independence

The article by Michael Phillips argues that modern family courts in the U.S. mirror the injustices of colonial rule, stripping parents of rights and imposing financial burdens without representation. It highlights issues of autonomy, accountability, and exploitation, urging a movement for reform to restore parental rights and challenge the corrupt judicial system.

A Second Declaration: How the Family Court Crisis Mirrors the Reasons We Fought for Independence Read More

Baltimore Courthouse ICE Arrest Exposes Tensions Between Law Enforcement and Political Agendas

On June 23, 2025, ICE agents detained an individual in Baltimore’s courthouse, sparking a criminal investigation against a corrections employee who facilitated their entry. Local leaders prioritized shielding undocumented immigrants over upholding law, indicating a troubling trend of politicizing justice and compromising public safety, undermining accountability and institutional integrity.

Baltimore Courthouse ICE Arrest Exposes Tensions Between Law Enforcement and Political Agendas Read More

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court

In a significant opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett criticized Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in Trump v. CASA, Inc., highlighting the dangers of judicial overreach and the role of courts. She emphasized that judges must interpret the law, not legislate, marking a crucial boundary for future judicial conduct.

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court Read More

Victory for Parents: Supreme Court’s Mahmoud v. Taylor Ruling Reaffirms Parental Rights and Religious Liberty

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Mahmoud v. Taylor, affirming parents’ rights to direct their children’s moral and religious upbringing within public education. The decision mandates schools to respect religious objections and ensure transparency in curricula. This landmark ruling signifies a new era for parental authority in education across the country.

Victory for Parents: Supreme Court’s Mahmoud v. Taylor Ruling Reaffirms Parental Rights and Religious Liberty Read More

🚨 Substack Just Silenced a Journalist. Who’s Next?

The article discusses the suspension of journalist Richard Luthmann from Substack after he published investigative pieces on political corruption. It criticizes Substack’s failure to uphold its free speech promises by yielding to online mob pressure. The piece warns that silencing independent voices endangers press freedom and democracy at large.

🚨 Substack Just Silenced a Journalist. Who’s Next? Read More

You Have the Right to Remain Silent—Yes, Even in Family Court

Miranda Rights extend beyond criminal arrests to family court, which can threaten personal liberty and finances. Individuals facing inquiries about finances may invoke the Fifth Amendment to protect against self-incrimination. With no constitutional safeguards, understanding one’s rights in family court is essential, as the implications can be severe and life-altering.

You Have the Right to Remain Silent—Yes, Even in Family Court Read More

Op-Ed: The Hypocrisy of Family Law — Why Family Court Should Be Abolished

They call it family law, but the only thing it truly governs is separation, silence, and suffering. This is not justice — it’s bureaucracy weaponized against love. In a system where judges hide behind opinion and immunity, where money decides custody, and where the Constitution is conveniently ignored, we must ask: who benefits from this chaos? Certainly not the children. Not the parents. Only the lawyers, the evaluators, the GALs, and the judges padding their pensions. The time has come to stop reforming family court — and start abolishing it.

Op-Ed: The Hypocrisy of Family Law — Why Family Court Should Be Abolished Read More

Innocent Until Family Court: How Due Process Dies Behind Closed Doors

Family court in the U.S. operates differently from criminal courts, lacking essential rights like the presumption of innocence and a jury. False allegations are common, leading to unjust outcomes. The burden of proof lies with the accused, and mental health issues are weaponized against parents. Reforms are urgently needed to ensure fairness and due process.

Innocent Until Family Court: How Due Process Dies Behind Closed Doors Read More