Investigative Journalism | Exposing What Lies Beneath
In America’s family courts, the principle that no one should be a judge in their own case is often violated. The case of Marc Fishman highlights this issue, as Judge Michelle I. Schauer, with a contentious history with Fishman, asserts control over his custody case despite allegations of bias and ethical concerns, undermining judicial impartiality.
The content details a troubling incident where armed agents attempted to abduct children from San Marcos schools without a warrant or due process. It illustrates a flawed system allowing private evaluators to manipulate legal actions against parents based solely on allegations, undermining constitutional rights and accountability. The narrative emphasizes the operational secrecy and procedural failures leading to the crisis.
Before the Knock: What Triggers a Family Court Abduction Attempt? Read MoreOn May 8, 2025, a California court ruled in favor of Trish Miroth against Trinity County Child Protective Services, challenging unlawful child removal. The court rejected the County’s motion to dismiss based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, affirming federal jurisdiction in civil rights cases. This landmark decision empowers families against CPS overreach.
Miroth v. Trinity County: A Landmark Win for Families Fighting CPS Injustice Read MoreVeterans and first responders, who sacrifice for our safety, face unjust treatment in family court. Their service is misinterpreted as disqualification from parenthood, leading to custody loss. The system is biased, often favoring those who remain behind. Reform is essential to ensure justice protects rather than punishes those who serve.
No One Is Safe: How Family Court Punishes Our Heroes Read MoreOn May 6, 2025, Ann Vandersteel launched AmericanMadeAction.org in Washington, D.C., advocating for accountability and constitutional fidelity. The nonprofit introduces the Department of Government Accountability (DOGA) and United Law Coalition (ULC) to combat government overreach. Emphasizing peaceful resistance, the movement seeks to restore citizens’ rights and constitutional governance.
A Second American Awakening? Inside the Movement Behind AmericanMadeAction.org and the Push to Restore Constitutional Rule Read MoreThe Texas Senate’s passage of the “Three Strikes Law” aims to impose stricter penalties for custody interference. While Maryland’s courts favor cooperative parenting over accountability, advocates suggest a modified bill could emerge. Conversely, Virginia’s political landscape may support bipartisan child protection laws, potentially paving the way for similar measures.
Could a ‘Three Strikes’ Law for Custody Interference Pass in Maryland or Virginia? Read MoreThe Texas Senate passed Senate Bill 2794, enhancing penalties for repeated child custody interference, potentially categorizing the third offense as a felony. Discussion arises regarding the feasibility of similar laws in states like Maryland, with its progressive but lenient family court system, and Virginia, where bipartisan support for child protection is growing.
Could a ‘Three Strikes’ Law for Custody Interference Pass in Maryland or Virginia? Read MoreA New Jersey family court judge’s statement that “The Constitution doesn’t apply in my courtroom” reflects a broader issue in courts nationwide, especially in family law. The article argues that constitutional rights must be upheld across all judicial actions, insisting on accountability and condemning judicial tyranny in family courts where parental rights are violated.
“The Constitution Doesn’t Apply Here”: The Most Dangerous Lie in America’s Courtrooms Read MoreOn May 1, 2025, in San Marcos, California, heavily armed individuals mistakenly identified as law enforcement attempted to abduct two schoolchildren without legal authority. Their mother, Giselle Smiel, exposed systemic failures in protecting parental rights and due process, highlighting the dangers of Alternative Dispute Resolution tactics disguised as justice, endangering children in schools.
No Warrant. No Order. Just Lies. — The San Marcos School Ambush Exposing Family Court Fraud Read MoreMahmoud v. Taylor highlights a troubling trend in American family courts where fit parents’ rights are overridden based on vague “best interest” claims without proof of unfitness or harm. This undermines due process, as courts increasingly disregard constitutional protections for parental rights, leading to unjust custody decisions. Immediate reform is necessary.
The Constitution Is Not a Vibe: How Parham v. J.R. and Other Landmark Cases Expose the Lie at the Heart of Mahmoud v. Taylor Read More