Child Support & “Double Dipping” – The Absurd Economics of Erasing a Parent

The Reichert v. Hornbeck case highlights the absurdity of Maryland’s family court system, where a biological father is forced to pay child support despite being replaced as a parent without due process. This practice not only undermines the child’s best interests but also serves the economic interests of the court and state.

Child Support & “Double Dipping” – The Absurd Economics of Erasing a Parent Read More

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence

In Reichert v. Hornbeck, the Circuit Court has created a dangerous legal precedent by granting John H. Michel parental standing without any legal justification or consideration of the child’s wishes. This ruling threatens the rights of fit biological parents in Maryland, allowing judges to grant parental status to unrelated third parties arbitrarily.

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence Read More

Who Broke the Family? How Politicians Helped Corrupt the Courts and Undermine American Values

The article by Michael Phillips critiques America’s family court system, highlighting how bipartisan legislation has led to corruption, custody battles, and financial distress for families. It examines key laws and politicians responsible, emphasizing issues like unchecked judicial authority and Title IV-D’s perverse financial incentives that harm family stability and children’s well-being.

Who Broke the Family? How Politicians Helped Corrupt the Courts and Undermine American Values Read More