Home » Supreme Court » Page 3

Finally, A Course Correction: Why Shrinking the U.S. Department of Education Is Long Overdue

The Supreme Court’s July 2025 ruling to uphold cuts to the Department of Education is seen as a victory for state control over education, countering federal overreach. Critics argue it threatens public schools, but supporters view it as a chance to empower local leaders, enhance accountability, and prioritize education over political agendas.

Finally, A Course Correction: Why Shrinking the U.S. Department of Education Is Long Overdue Read More

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files (Part 2)

The American Inns of Court (AIC) operates as a private, powerful guild influencing the U.S. judiciary without public oversight or accountability. This secretive organization fosters bias and creates a legal caste system. Recent impeachment calls against Chief Justice Roberts have spotlighted these issues, raising concerns about fairness and transparency in the justice system.

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files (Part 2) Read More

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files

Janice Wolk Grenadier is challenging Chief Justice John G. Roberts over the upcoming private gala at the Supreme Court, which she argues symbolizes elitism in the judiciary. She filed a Petition for Impeachment citing constitutional violations and calling for Congress to act against the growing disconnect between the legal elite and ordinary citizens.

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files Read More

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court

In a significant opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett criticized Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in Trump v. CASA, Inc., highlighting the dangers of judicial overreach and the role of courts. She emphasized that judges must interpret the law, not legislate, marking a crucial boundary for future judicial conduct.

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court Read More

Victory for Parents: Supreme Court’s Mahmoud v. Taylor Ruling Reaffirms Parental Rights and Religious Liberty

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Mahmoud v. Taylor, affirming parents’ rights to direct their children’s moral and religious upbringing within public education. The decision mandates schools to respect religious objections and ensure transparency in curricula. This landmark ruling signifies a new era for parental authority in education across the country.

Victory for Parents: Supreme Court’s Mahmoud v. Taylor Ruling Reaffirms Parental Rights and Religious Liberty Read More

The Supreme Court Dodges the Gun Rights Fight — For Now

The Supreme Court’s decision not to hear a challenge to Maryland’s assault weapons ban allows the law to remain, yet the Second Amendment debate continues. The Court is strategically waiting for a more significant case to address gun rights nationwide, potentially leading to impactful changes in gun laws, including Maryland’s.

The Supreme Court Dodges the Gun Rights Fight — For Now Read More

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case

William Sewell, a South Carolina father, faces potential incarceration over unpaid child support and a hefty guardian ad litem fee. His case raises due process concerns, particularly regarding the right to legal counsel as outlined in Turner v. Rogers. This situation highlights systemic injustices towards indigent parents in family courts across the U.S.

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case Read More

The Constitution Is Not a Vibe: How Parham v. J.R. and Other Landmark Cases Expose the Lie at the Heart of Mahmoud v. Taylor

Mahmoud v. Taylor highlights a troubling trend in American family courts where fit parents’ rights are overridden based on vague “best interest” claims without proof of unfitness or harm. This undermines due process, as courts increasingly disregard constitutional protections for parental rights, leading to unjust custody decisions. Immediate reform is necessary.

The Constitution Is Not a Vibe: How Parham v. J.R. and Other Landmark Cases Expose the Lie at the Heart of Mahmoud v. Taylor Read More