Three thousand miles apart, two Republican challengers are running into the same wall — and one of them at least seems to know it’s there.
By Michael Phillips | Riptide
In California, Steve Hilton trails Democrat Xavier Becerra by as much as 18 points in the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll conducted Aug. 3-9, with a Hilton-commissioned survey conducted Aug. 14-18 showing a narrower, single-digit gap (49.2%-41%). A newer independent survey — PPIC’s September poll — found Becerra actually widening back out to a 22-point lead, 60%-38%, suggesting the campaign poll is the outlier rather than a trend. In Maryland, Dan Cox trails Gov. Wes Moore 58%-31% — a 27-point margin — in a Zenith Research poll conducted for Maryland Now in late July and early August, about five points narrower than the 32-point margin Moore posted against him in 2022. Both men currently trail their Democratic opponents substantially across the independent polling. The more interesting question is what’s actually stopping them — and it isn’t quite what either party’s boosters want it to be.
“Both men currently trail their Democratic opponents substantially across the independent polling. The more interesting question is what’s actually stopping them.”
The Mechanism, Not the Man
Start with what the two races share structurally. California Democrats outnumber Republicans by nearly 1.8-to-1 (44.9% to 25%), with 5.3 million no-party-preference voters making up almost a quarter of the electorate. Maryland’s registration split is a bit more lopsided — roughly 51% Democratic, 24% Republican — with a smaller, roughly 1 million-strong unaffiliated bloc. Hilton carries Donald Trump’s 2026 endorsement into a general election in a state where Trump’s approval sits near the bottom nationally; Cox carries Trump’s 2022 endorsement as part of his political identity but has publicly said this cycle that he isn’t seeking one and isn’t currently asking for it — a distinction that matters for the comparison below. Both are running against genuine, measurable discontent: rising utility and housing costs in California, and tax and affordability fatigue in Maryland, where Gonzales Research found nearly six in ten voters believe they’re overtaxed.
“Disapproval of the incumbent isn’t automatically converting into support for the Republican alternative.”
And in both states, that discontent simply isn’t converting into support for the Republican on the ballot — which is the real story here, more than either candidate’s individual weaknesses.
The clearest evidence is the gap between approval and vote choice — though the two states’ unaffiliated electorates are actually behaving quite differently beneath that similar registration math. Maryland’s unaffiliated voters have turned sharply on Moore: 47% approved of his performance in UMBC’s fall 2024 polling; in UMBC’s October 2025 poll, released in November, that had fallen to 42% approve, 56% disapprove. But ask those same voters who they’d actually vote for, and the number barely moves — Gonzales found them split 35%-32% for Moore over a generic Republican in January, UMBC had it 31%-31% in October. Disapproval of the incumbent isn’t automatically converting into support for the Republican alternative. Much of it is sitting uncommitted — UMBC’s statewide numbers show a real undecided-plus-other-candidate share alongside the generic-Republican share — rather than flowing straight to the GOP.
California’s no-party-preference voters are telling a different story entirely: Berkeley’s polling has them breaking for Becerra over Hilton by roughly 58%-30%, and Hilton’s own favorability with that group sits badly underwater, 31% favorable to 59% unfavorable. IGS poll director Mark DiCamillo has described the race as tracking almost entirely along party lines — over 80% of each party’s registered voters backing their own nominee — with Democrats’ registration edge alone giving Becerra a structural advantage before a single independent vote is counted. Unlike Maryland’s unaffiliated bloc, which is sitting on the fence, California’s is actively breaking against the Republican.
“Unlike Maryland’s unaffiliated bloc, which is sitting on the fence, California’s is actively breaking against the Republican.”
Two Different Bets Against the Same Wall
Where the races diverge is in how each candidate is betting against that ceiling.
Hilton, at least rhetorically, is running something closer to a change-election campaign than a base-mobilization one. His stump message leans heavily on affordability and “ending one-party rule” — though it’s not exclusively that; CalMatters has also flagged his proposals to reverse state greenhouse-gas mandates and other liberal policies — and in July he made the pitch explicit, telling Californians they could disagree with him on Trump and national politics entirely and still vote for him on state issues. It’s a strategy with real historical precedent in California: Hilton’s own advising background under David Cameron in the UK drew comparisons at the time to Arnold Schwarzenegger’s brand of moderate, technocratic Republicanism — the last kind of Republican to actually win statewide in California, in 2006. Whether Hilton can execute that positioning while carrying Trump’s endorsement is a separate question, and the polling suggests he mostly can’t. But the attempt — explicitly decoupling his candidacy from the national party brand — is visible in his messaging in a way that matters for the comparison below.
Cox isn’t making an equally affirmative appeal, though the picture is more nuanced than a simple contrast. To be clear, the distinction isn’t that Hilton talks affordability while Cox doesn’t — both campaigns are leaning heavily on kitchen-table economics, and Cox’s platform explicitly promises tax cuts, lower energy costs and a data-center moratorium. Cox has also, when asked directly this cycle, said his campaign is “about Maryland,” that he isn’t seeking Trump’s endorsement, and that he doesn’t currently have it — a real, if reactive, distancing. The sharper distinction is that Hilton has made courting anti-Trump and independent voters an affirmative part of his pitch, while Cox’s distancing has mostly surfaced in response to reporters’ questions, with his own affirmative message centered on affordability, taxes, energy and Maryland governance rather than an explicit “you can disagree with me on Trump” appeal. That matters because Maryland already has a working counter-model sitting in recent memory: Larry Hogan never carried Montgomery County outright — he lost it twice — but his statewide wins depended on dramatically outperforming normal Republican margins there and in similar Democratic-leaning suburbs, taking 44% in Montgomery in 2018 en route to winning Howard County outright and a 12-point statewide margin. Hogan also refused to endorse Cox in 2022 and called him a “QAnon whackjob.” That history hasn’t gone anywhere, and Cox’s current messaging — “about Maryland,” not about Trump — is a step toward addressing it, but a more muted one than Hogan’s own explicit break with the national party ever required.
“The distinction isn’t that Hilton talks affordability while Cox doesn’t — both campaigns are leaning heavily on kitchen-table economics.”
The result shows up in the numbers in a specific way: Cox isn’t just losing by the margin a generic Republican would lose by in Maryland — he’s underperforming it. A nameless Republican was already trailing Moore by roughly 20 to 22 points statewide in polling earlier this year; Cox, the actual nominee, is now down 27. That’s a modest but real gap, and it lands specifically among the independents who’d shown themselves genuinely gettable — the same voters who split Moore-generic-Republican almost dead even before Cox became the name on the ballot. That gap can’t be attributed to Cox alone — the generic-candidate and named-candidate polls were fielded at different times, under different conditions — but it’s an observed difference worth naming.
“That gap can’t be attributed to Cox alone — the generic-candidate and named-candidate polls were fielded at different times, under different conditions — but it’s an observed difference worth naming.”
What the Comparison Actually Shows
“Local economic discontent doesn’t automatically flow to whichever challenger is positioned to catch it.”
None of this is really a story about Steve Hilton’s talent or Dan Cox’s likability, and it shouldn’t be read as a partisan referendum on whether Californians or Marylanders are governing themselves well or badly — voters in both states disagree with each other about that, roughly along the same lines the polling shows. What the comparison does show is something more structural: in states where partisan identification has hardened this far, local economic discontent — real, measurable, and in both cases well-documented — doesn’t automatically flow to whichever challenger is positioned to catch it. It flows only to a challenger who can first get past the party label attached to him, and that turns out to be a much narrower opening than either campaign wants to admit.
Hilton is at least building a campaign shaped like an attempt to find that opening. Cox, so far, isn’t.
Sources: UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll (Aug. 3-9, 2026); Hilton campaign-commissioned poll conducted by David Wolfson (Aug. 14-18, 2026), as reported by Newsweek and GV Wire; Public Policy Institute of California surveys (June and September 2026); CalMatters reporting and commentary by Dan Walters on the Hilton-Bianco primary dynamic and Hilton’s political background (April-July 2026); AP reporting on Hilton’s July appeal to anti-Trump voters; ABC7/KABC reporting on the Berkeley poll’s independent-voter breakdown; California Secretary of State’s May 2026 Report of Registration; UMBC Institute of Politics polls (February 2025, October 2025, March 2026); Gonzales Research & Media poll (January 2026); Zenith Research poll for Maryland Now/Blended Public Affairs (July 27-Aug. 3, 2026), as reported by Maryland Matters and Fox45/WBFF; Maryland State Board of Elections certified results (2018, 2022) and 2026 voter registration statistics; The Baltimore Sun, The Baltimore Banner, Axios, WTOP, and WBAL reporting on Dan Cox’s 2022 and 2026 campaigns, his 2026 comments on Trump’s endorsement, and Larry Hogan’s non-endorsement; Newsweek analysis of the Hogan precedent (June 2026).
Keep This Reporting Free
If this work matters to you, please consider supporting it.
Your contribution helps fund independent reporting across our entire network.
Discover more from RIPTIDE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
