Home » Judicial » Page 9

The $10 Billion Courtroom Con: How “ADR Reform” Built an Administrative Empire

In 1990, the Judicial Improvements Act aimed to streamline justice through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), but resulted in an unprecedented expansion of federal courthouses. Instead of reducing litigation, the system evolved into a bureaucratic empire focused on mediation and settlement, compromising transparency and constitutional rights while increasing costs and delays.

The $10 Billion Courtroom Con: How “ADR Reform” Built an Administrative Empire Read More

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias

Texas has introduced the TRUST Act to enhance judicial transparency by requiring judges to disclose financial contributions from parties appearing in their courts. This initiative addresses concerns over bias due to political contributions, aiming to restore public confidence in the legal system. Maryland and Virginia should adopt similar measures to ensure fairness and accountability in their judiciary.

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias Read More

Broken by Design: The Hidden Crisis in Virginia’s Family Courts

Virginia’s family courts prioritize profit over justice, operating in secrecy that undermines due process and children’s welfare. With federal funding encouraging conflict, families suffer from arbitrary rulings and a lack of accountability. Courts utilize Alternative Dispute Resolution, often to the detriment of parents and children. Reform is vital for true justice.

Broken by Design: The Hidden Crisis in Virginia’s Family Courts Read More

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias

Texas’ TRUST Act mandates judges disclose campaign contributions and financial support from parties appearing in court, enhancing transparency and restoring public faith in the judicial system. Maryland and Virginia lack similar transparency measures, raising concerns about bias and favoritism. Introducing a TRUST Act in these states would promote fairness and accountability.

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias Read More

Post Malone’s Custody Battle: When Coachella Collides with the Courtroom

Post Malone faces a custody battle over his 2-year-old daughter with ex-fiancée Hee Sung “Jamie” Park, complicating his life just before a major performance. With conflicting petitions in California and Utah, the case highlights the challenges high-profile parents encounter in family court, where jurisdiction significantly affects custody and child support outcomes.

Post Malone’s Custody Battle: When Coachella Collides with the Courtroom Read More

The Colonists Were Smarter Than Us: They Banned Lawyers

The early American colonists wisely banned lawyers from their courts to prevent conflict from being professionalized and manipulated, believing that disputes should be resolved by community members. In contrast, modern America is overwhelmed by lawyers, leading to litigation instead of resolution, highlighting the foresight of the colonists in safeguarding societal harmony.

The Colonists Were Smarter Than Us: They Banned Lawyers Read More

The Revolving Door Spins Again: Judge Harry Storm Retires Into the Same Broken System He Helped Create

Judge Harry C. Storm’s retirement in 2025 marked his transition from the Montgomery County Circuit Court to a role in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) at The McCammon Group. This move reflects a continuation of a justice system focused on procedural efficiency rather than true constitutional rights, further entrenching existing flaws in court governance.

The Revolving Door Spins Again: Judge Harry Storm Retires Into the Same Broken System He Helped Create Read More

Why Trump Targeting the American Bar Association Could Shake the Entire Justice System

President Trump’s unprecedented attacks on the American Bar Association (ABA) highlight his belief that it perpetuates a corrupt judiciary. He criticizes the ABA for bias in judicial ratings and lack of accountability for unethical lawyers. This confrontation aims to address public frustrations with an inaccessible legal system and could catalyze significant reforms.

Why Trump Targeting the American Bar Association Could Shake the Entire Justice System Read More

Top 10 Worst Places a Judge Can Be Arrested by the FBI

The post humorously outlines the top ten most embarrassing places for a judge to be arrested by the FBI, highlighting scenarios such as a commencement speech, a massage session, and even during a trial. Each situation emphasizes the irony and absurdity of a judge’s downfall in unexpected settings, showcasing the universality of karma.

Top 10 Worst Places a Judge Can Be Arrested by the FBI Read More