Home » Corruption » Page 13

No Counsel, No Help, No Justice: What Happens When the Family Court System Targets the Poor

William Sewell’s story highlights systemic failures in family courts that disadvantage poor parents. Denied legal aid and faced with ineffective representation, he experienced retaliation when seeking help. This reflects a broader issue where low-income individuals are punished for asserting their rights, revealing a need for significant reforms in the legal system.

No Counsel, No Help, No Justice: What Happens When the Family Court System Targets the Poor Read More

Ripped Apart: How Family Court Manipulation Destroyed the Bond Between a Father and His Daughter

William H. Sewell, a devoted father, recounts the devastating impact of legal manipulation and parental alienation that severed his relationship with his daughter, Dema. Despite presenting evidence of harm and distress, the court ignored his concerns. His story highlights the flaws within the family court system and its detrimental effects on children.

Ripped Apart: How Family Court Manipulation Destroyed the Bond Between a Father and His Daughter Read More

The Protected Predator: How Lane Schlesinger Evaded Accountability for 15 Years

In New Rochelle, former police officer Lane Schlesinger exemplifies systemic misconduct, ignoring regulations during a COVID-19 incident and facing no accountability for numerous violations. Instead of discipline, he retired with a generous pension while individuals like Marc Fishman endure unjust consequences. This case highlights a troubling culture within police departments favoring protection over integrity.

The Protected Predator: How Lane Schlesinger Evaded Accountability for 15 Years Read More

Blocked at the Clerk’s Window: When Legal Assistance Becomes Legal Obstruction for Pro Se Parents Like William Sewell

William Sewell, a pro se litigant in South Carolina, faces systemic legal obstruction at the Dorchester County Family Court. The clerk denies him access to file motions without providing clear guidance, exacerbating his financial struggles. This highlights a broader issue of favoritism and lack of support for self-represented individuals in the justice system.

Blocked at the Clerk’s Window: When Legal Assistance Becomes Legal Obstruction for Pro Se Parents Like William Sewell Read More

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case

William Sewell, a South Carolina father, faces potential incarceration over unpaid child support and a hefty guardian ad litem fee. His case raises due process concerns, particularly regarding the right to legal counsel as outlined in Turner v. Rogers. This situation highlights systemic injustices towards indigent parents in family courts across the U.S.

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case Read More

The Child Support Industrial Complex: How Defense Contractors Like Lockheed Martin Turned Broken Families Into Big Business

Michael Phillips highlights the troubling involvement of defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, now Conduent, in child support enforcement. This privatization has transformed the system into a profit-driven industry that prioritizes metrics over families, leading to automation that harms vulnerable parents. The need for reform, transparency, and human oversight is critical.

The Child Support Industrial Complex: How Defense Contractors Like Lockheed Martin Turned Broken Families Into Big Business Read More

Mechanic vs. Machine: How a South Carolina Family Court Is Destroying a Father With Legal Extortion

William H. Sewell, a South Carolina father, faces jail for inability to pay a $25,000 fee to a Guardian ad Litem, despite being deemed fit. Sewell’s custody case highlights systemic corruption, legal extortion, and a lack of accountability within family courts that crush economically disadvantaged parents. His story urges for reform and visibility.

Mechanic vs. Machine: How a South Carolina Family Court Is Destroying a Father With Legal Extortion Read More

Back in the Game: Why New Jersey’s Decision to Reinstate Disbarred Lawyers Should Outrage Every American

The New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent ruling allows disbarred lawyers, including those convicted of theft and fraud, to seek reinstatement after five years. This decision underscores a justice system that favors professionals while punishing ordinary citizens for minor errors. Advocates call for accountability and transparency in legal reinstatements.

Back in the Game: Why New Jersey’s Decision to Reinstate Disbarred Lawyers Should Outrage Every American Read More

The New Warlords: How Private Corporations Replaced Governments in the Name of Freedom

The post discusses the rise of corporate power following the fall of the Berlin Wall, highlighting the outsourcing of government functions to private companies in areas like military operations, prisons, and intelligence. It argues that this shift has led to a system prioritizing profit over public welfare, fostering neo-feudalism and diminishing democratic oversight.

The New Warlords: How Private Corporations Replaced Governments in the Name of Freedom Read More

Stories Into Storms: How Digital Advocacy is the Key to Fixing America’s Family Courts

The author shares their harrowing experience in the American family court system, highlighting its failings and the toll it took on their life. They emphasize the importance of digital advocacy, as individuals unite to expose systemic abuse. By sharing stories, they aim to demand accountability, challenge court secrecy, and push for reform.

Stories Into Storms: How Digital Advocacy is the Key to Fixing America’s Family Courts Read More