Home » 4 - Cases » Page 2

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges

Sarah Hornbeck has filed a Motion to Dismiss in the federal case Reichert v. Hornbeck after a deposition where she faltered under questioning regarding the evidence for her criminal charges against ex-husband Jeff Reichert. Critics claim her motion is a desperate attempt to avoid accountability in a long custody battle that alienated Reichert from their son.

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges Read More

“I Don’t Recall”: Inside the Deposition That Could Unravel a Maryland Attorney’s Protective-Order Case

A recent deposition in the federal case Reichert v. Hornbeck is raising serious questions about the credibility of key accusations that once led to dozens of criminal charges against a father locked in a custody dispute.

During questioning, Sarah Hornbeck repeatedly stated she did not recall critical events surrounding those allegations—events that ultimately led to the plaintiff spending time in jail and facing years of litigation before the charges were dismissed.

Court filings indicate the accusations resulted in at least 26 criminal charges, all of which were later dropped or dismissed.

The pattern of memory gaps now sits at the center of a federal malicious prosecution lawsuit.

“I Don’t Recall”: Inside the Deposition That Could Unravel a Maryland Attorney’s Protective-Order Case Read More

The Reichert Files: What the Defendant Admitted Under Oath

A February 2026 deposition in the federal case against Jeffrey Reichert revealed significant details about his contentious custody battle with Sarah Hornbeck. Hornbeck admitted her past DUI arrest and expressed memory gaps regarding critical events, raising questions about the reliability of her prior legal filings. The deposition highlights the complexities and ongoing nature of their legal conflict.

The Reichert Files: What the Defendant Admitted Under Oath Read More

When Institutions Pick a Parent

A federal lawsuit in Maryland challenges how private schools manage parental custody disputes, focusing on Concordia Preparatory School’s alleged improper involvement in a custody conflict. The case raises critical questions about school responsibilities in such matters, particularly surrounding the enforcement of unserved protective orders and how institutions handle conflicting parental claims.

When Institutions Pick a Parent Read More

Disability Advocates Condemn New York Court of Appeals and Judge Anthony Cannataro for Denying Disabled Father Access to Justice

The New York Court of Appeals dismissed Marc Fishman’s appeal regarding ADA violations during his seven-year litigation, claiming it lacked jurisdiction. Despite a federal judge’s order for accommodations, Westchester courts denied necessary support, highlighting systemic issues in New York’s justice system that prevent disabled litigants from obtaining fair treatment and redress. Advocates call for legislative reforms.

Disability Advocates Condemn New York Court of Appeals and Judge Anthony Cannataro for Denying Disabled Father Access to Justice Read More

The Psychiatric Weapon: How Mental Health Was Turned into a Weapon of Control

California’s family courts exploit psychological diagnoses to control parents, monetizing their trauma under the guise of therapy. The interconnected system—comprising judges, evaluators, and therapists—creates dependencies that perpetuate conflict and financial burdens on families. Brenna Gano’s case exemplifies this abuse, revealing systemic failures and calls for urgent reform to protect vulnerable individuals.

The Psychiatric Weapon: How Mental Health Was Turned into a Weapon of Control Read More

The Disabilities You Don’t See — and the Systems That Still Don’t See Us

The article addresses the plight of individuals with invisible disabilities in America, highlighting systemic bias in courts and workplaces. Despite the ADA’s provisions, many face barriers due to outdated perceptions and bureaucratic inefficiencies, resulting in detrimental outcomes. Advocates emphasize the need for better enforcement and understanding of these disabilities.

The Disabilities You Don’t See — and the Systems That Still Don’t See Us Read More

Justice Denied: Why New York Must Answer for Marc Fishman

A disabled father, Marc Fishman, faces wrongful imprisonment in New York despite clear evidence of his innocence, including admission from the arresting officer, Officer Schlesinger, later identified as corrupt. The prosecution disregards ethical obligations and fails to provide necessary accommodations. Marc’s story underscores systemic injustices threatening all citizens’ rights.

Justice Denied: Why New York Must Answer for Marc Fishman Read More

New York’s Shame: The State Hunts Marc Fishman While Ignoring Real Justice

In New York, Marc Fishman, a disabled father, endures a legal nightmare due to false accusations and judicial misconduct, facing a 45-day jail sentence despite exculpatory evidence. His appeals are delayed amid a lack of gubernatorial intervention, highlighting systemic failures and the abuse of power within the judicial system. Fishman’s plight reflects broader issues of injustice affecting vulnerable citizens.

New York’s Shame: The State Hunts Marc Fishman While Ignoring Real Justice Read More

Friday Night Lights, Dark Family Secrets: How a Father Who Won Was Erased — And Who Profited

A Maryland father who once beat the family court system and won full custody has been systematically erased from his son’s life. From protective orders to police intimidation and schools shutting their doors, every institution has been weaponized to enforce his absence. This isn’t a custody dispute. It’s a hit — executed in plain sight under Friday night lights.

Friday Night Lights, Dark Family Secrets: How a Father Who Won Was Erased — And Who Profited Read More