Investigative Journalism | Exposing What Lies Beneath
Westchester County Family Court Judge Michelle I. Schauer has unlawfully restricted disabled father Marc Fishman’s access to his twin sons’ school records, violating federal laws like FERPA and the ADA. This act reflects judicial overreach and potential discrimination, prompting calls for federal intervention and accountability for the judge and associated legal entities.
The content discusses survivorship bias in family court, highlighting how focus on positive outcomes obscures the experiences of those who do not succeed. It emphasizes the need for accountability and reform, urging for attention to the hidden failures and severe impacts on parents who are alienated or harmed by the system.
The Survivorship Bias of Family Court: What We’re Missing Could Be What Matters Most Read MoreThe post critiques the shift from traditional courts, which uphold justice as a constitutional right, to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) systems that charge for legal services, undermining due process. It highlights court cases emphasizing access to justice without fees and calls for reform to restore constitutional rights and challenge the financial burden placed on litigants.
Justice for Sale: How ADR Courts Hijacked Due Process and Made You Pay for It Read MoreIn a world where family court and civil litigation have become synonymous with prolonged suffering and endless bills, a growing sector quietly rakes in profits by exploiting the very chaos …
The Revolving Door of Injustice: How The McCammon Group and Juridical Solutions Profit Off the Broken System They Helped Create Read MoreJudge Harry Storm’s retirement marks not an end to injustice but a transition to a lucrative role in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), where he profits from family distress. This illustrates a broader issue: family courts prioritize profit over justice, perpetuating a system that undermines due process and exploits vulnerable families.
Feeding From the System: Judge Harry Storm’s Retirement Gig Exposes the Real Engine Behind Family Court Corruption Read MoreThe early American colonists wisely banned lawyers from their courts to prevent conflict from being professionalized and manipulated, believing that disputes should be resolved by community members. In contrast, modern America is overwhelmed by lawyers, leading to litigation instead of resolution, highlighting the foresight of the colonists in safeguarding societal harmony.
The Colonists Were Smarter Than Us: They Banned Lawyers Read More
The post humorously outlines the top ten most embarrassing places for a judge to be arrested by the FBI, highlighting scenarios such as a commencement speech, a massage session, and even during a trial. Each situation emphasizes the irony and absurdity of a judge’s downfall in unexpected settings, showcasing the universality of karma.
Top 10 Worst Places a Judge Can Be Arrested by the FBI Read More