Tag: judicial accountability
Anne Arundel County / Baltimore City / Baltimore County / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Family Court / Judges / Judicial Disability / Juveniles / The Reichert Files

The Courtroom That Erased Fatherhood: Four Father’s Days Without a Word

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

Four Father’s Days have come and gone. Four years of silence. Four years of sanctioned cruelty disguised as justice. Jeff Reichert hasn’t disappeared — the court disappeared him. And his son, Grant? Taken from the life he chose, the father he trusted, and the stability he thrived in — all because Maryland decided this father wasn’t supposed to win.

The Courtroom That Erased Fatherhood: Four Father’s Days Without a Word Read More
Ada Accommodations / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Disability / Family Court / Judges / Judicial Disability / Montgomery County

Every Motion Denied: A Father’s Day Message from the Broken Heart of Maryland Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

In Montgomery County, Maryland, a father has been unable to see his son since January 2024 due to the Circuit Court’s refusal to enforce a court order. Despite filing around 100 motions requesting enforcement and accommodations for disabilities, all efforts were ignored or denied, reflecting systemic neglect of fathers’ rights within the family court system.

Every Motion Denied: A Father’s Day Message from the Broken Heart of Maryland Family Court Read More
Child Support / Legislation / Policy

Maryland’s New Child Support Rules: A Fast-Track to Poverty and Prison?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Maryland’s recent procedural changes in child support cases facilitate electronic service, which the state claims will help low-income families. However, these changes create vulnerabilities for struggling parents, primarily fathers, allowing for easier enforcement actions without adequate due process. Critics argue this reform prioritizes revenue generation over genuine support and justice for families.

Maryland’s New Child Support Rules: A Fast-Track to Poverty and Prison? Read More
Adr / Advocacy / Attorneys / Child Custody / Constitutional Law / Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / Fraud / Judges / Judicial Disability / Legislation

When the Innocent Fear the Courtroom: Why the Family Court System Must Be Abolished

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family courts have become terrifying spaces for fit parents, often treating them as defendants and stripping them of custody based on unfounded allegations. The system is criticized for its coercive mediation practices, lack of due process, and enabling parental alienation. Reform is urgently needed to protect families and ensure justice.

When the Innocent Fear the Courtroom: Why the Family Court System Must Be Abolished Read More
Attorneys / Child Custody / Corruption / Court Reform / Cps / Crime Violence / Criminal / Family Court / Judges / Judicial Disability / Veterans / Washington

Three Little Graves: What Happens When the System Breaks a Father and Buries His Children

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Three little girls, Paityn, Evelyn, and Olivia, were tragically murdered during a court-approved visit with their father, Travis Decker, a homeless veteran with untreated PTSD. This incident highlights failures within the family court system, mental health evaluations, and social services. It calls for urgent reform to prevent such tragedies in the future.

Three Little Graves: What Happens When the System Breaks a Father and Buries His Children Read More
Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / South Carolina

Is It Ever Legal to Let a Child Drink? In Family Court, the Answer Depends on Who You Are.

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

William Sewell alleges that family court in South Carolina ignored credible evidence of his ex-wife allowing their young daughter to sip alcoholic drinks, while he faces contempt charges. This highlights systemic bias in family courts, where mothers’ behavior is often overlooked and fathers are unfairly scrutinized, undermining child safety and trust in the legal system.

Is It Ever Legal to Let a Child Drink? In Family Court, the Answer Depends on Who You Are. Read More
Adr / Contractors / Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / Politics / Privitization

The Child Support Industrial Complex: How Defense Contractors Like Lockheed Martin Turned Broken Families Into Big Business

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Michael Phillips highlights the troubling involvement of defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, now Conduent, in child support enforcement. This privatization has transformed the system into a profit-driven industry that prioritizes metrics over families, leading to automation that harms vulnerable parents. The need for reform, transparency, and human oversight is critical.

The Child Support Industrial Complex: How Defense Contractors Like Lockheed Martin Turned Broken Families Into Big Business Read More
Advocacy / California / Civil Rights / Criminal / Family Court / Illinois / New Jersey / Texas

When Parenting Time Becomes Optional: How Criminal Contempt Laws Can Be Used to Hold Custody Violators Accountable

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system exhibits a double standard in enforcing parenting rights, where noncompliance with child support is strictly penalized, while visitation violations often go unaddressed. Bruce Eden’s strategy advocates using criminal contempt laws to enforce visitation rights, aiming to highlight and challenge this imbalance while advocating for legislative reforms.

When Parenting Time Becomes Optional: How Criminal Contempt Laws Can Be Used to Hold Custody Violators Accountable Read More
Judges / Judicial Disability / Wisconsin

“One Strike, You’re Still In?” — Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 7-Day Suspension of Judge Raises Questions About Judicial Accountability

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a 7-day suspension to Judge Ellen K. Berz for misconduct, including attempting to influence a prosecutor and concealing facts during an investigation. This lenient punishment raises concerns about accountability and trust in the judicial system, highlighting that judges should face serious consequences for breaches of conduct.

“One Strike, You’re Still In?” — Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 7-Day Suspension of Judge Raises Questions About Judicial Accountability Read More
Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / New Jersey / Politics

Back in the Game: Why New Jersey’s Decision to Reinstate Disbarred Lawyers Should Outrage Every American

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent ruling allows disbarred lawyers, including those convicted of theft and fraud, to seek reinstatement after five years. This decision underscores a justice system that favors professionals while punishing ordinary citizens for minor errors. Advocates call for accountability and transparency in legal reinstatements.

Back in the Game: Why New Jersey’s Decision to Reinstate Disbarred Lawyers Should Outrage Every American Read More