Tag: judicial accountability

Adr / Advocacy / Attorneys / Child Custody / Constitutional Law / Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / Fraud / Judges / Judicial Disability / Legislation

When the Innocent Fear the Courtroom: Why the Family Court System Must Be Abolished

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family courts have become terrifying spaces for fit parents, often treating them as defendants and stripping them of custody based on unfounded allegations. The system is criticized for its coercive mediation practices, lack of due process, and enabling parental alienation. Reform is urgently needed to protect families and ensure justice.

When the Innocent Fear the Courtroom: Why the Family Court System Must Be Abolished Read More
Attorneys / Child Custody / Corruption / Court Reform / Cps / Crime Violence / Criminal / Family Court / Judges / Judicial Disability / Veterans / Washington

Three Little Graves: What Happens When the System Breaks a Father and Buries His Children

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Three little girls, Paityn, Evelyn, and Olivia, were tragically murdered during a court-approved visit with their father, Travis Decker, a homeless veteran with untreated PTSD. This incident highlights failures within the family court system, mental health evaluations, and social services. It calls for urgent reform to prevent such tragedies in the future.

Three Little Graves: What Happens When the System Breaks a Father and Buries His Children Read More
Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / South Carolina

Is It Ever Legal to Let a Child Drink? In Family Court, the Answer Depends on Who You Are.

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

William Sewell alleges that family court in South Carolina ignored credible evidence of his ex-wife allowing their young daughter to sip alcoholic drinks, while he faces contempt charges. This highlights systemic bias in family courts, where mothers’ behavior is often overlooked and fathers are unfairly scrutinized, undermining child safety and trust in the legal system.

Is It Ever Legal to Let a Child Drink? In Family Court, the Answer Depends on Who You Are. Read More
Adr / Contractors / Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / Politics / Privitization

The Child Support Industrial Complex: How Defense Contractors Like Lockheed Martin Turned Broken Families Into Big Business

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Michael Phillips highlights the troubling involvement of defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, now Conduent, in child support enforcement. This privatization has transformed the system into a profit-driven industry that prioritizes metrics over families, leading to automation that harms vulnerable parents. The need for reform, transparency, and human oversight is critical.

The Child Support Industrial Complex: How Defense Contractors Like Lockheed Martin Turned Broken Families Into Big Business Read More
Advocacy / California / Civil Rights / Criminal / Family Court / Illinois / New Jersey / Texas

When Parenting Time Becomes Optional: How Criminal Contempt Laws Can Be Used to Hold Custody Violators Accountable

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system exhibits a double standard in enforcing parenting rights, where noncompliance with child support is strictly penalized, while visitation violations often go unaddressed. Bruce Eden’s strategy advocates using criminal contempt laws to enforce visitation rights, aiming to highlight and challenge this imbalance while advocating for legislative reforms.

When Parenting Time Becomes Optional: How Criminal Contempt Laws Can Be Used to Hold Custody Violators Accountable Read More
Judges / Judicial Disability / Wisconsin

“One Strike, You’re Still In?” — Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 7-Day Suspension of Judge Raises Questions About Judicial Accountability

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a 7-day suspension to Judge Ellen K. Berz for misconduct, including attempting to influence a prosecutor and concealing facts during an investigation. This lenient punishment raises concerns about accountability and trust in the judicial system, highlighting that judges should face serious consequences for breaches of conduct.

“One Strike, You’re Still In?” — Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 7-Day Suspension of Judge Raises Questions About Judicial Accountability Read More
Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / New Jersey / Politics

Back in the Game: Why New Jersey’s Decision to Reinstate Disbarred Lawyers Should Outrage Every American

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent ruling allows disbarred lawyers, including those convicted of theft and fraud, to seek reinstatement after five years. This decision underscores a justice system that favors professionals while punishing ordinary citizens for minor errors. Advocates call for accountability and transparency in legal reinstatements.

Back in the Game: Why New Jersey’s Decision to Reinstate Disbarred Lawyers Should Outrage Every American Read More
Advocacy / Civil Rights / Court Reform / Crime Violence

The Silent Epidemic of False Accusations — And Why No One in Power Wants to Talk About It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The article highlights that 20 million Americans report being falsely accused of domestic violence, yet this issue remains unaddressed in media and legislation. It critiques the neglect of due process in favor of funding and narratives that prioritize victims, emphasizing the need for reform to protect the rights of the wrongfully accused.

The Silent Epidemic of False Accusations — And Why No One in Power Wants to Talk About It Read More
Court Reform / Family Court / Legislation / Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Moves to Reform Family Courts and Courtroom Transparency: The Jamie Flick Bills

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Pennsylvania, State Representative Jamie Flick has introduced two significant bills aimed at reforming family court practices amid increased public scrutiny. House Bill 378 seeks to simplify child custody decisions and promote shared parenting, while House Bill 1397 would allow audio and video recordings of courtroom proceedings for transparency. Both bills highlight a growing demand for reform.

Pennsylvania Moves to Reform Family Courts and Courtroom Transparency: The Jamie Flick Bills Read More
Advocacy / Civil Rights / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court

Stories Into Storms: How Digital Advocacy is the Key to Fixing America’s Family Courts

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The author shares their harrowing experience in the American family court system, highlighting its failings and the toll it took on their life. They emphasize the importance of digital advocacy, as individuals unite to expose systemic abuse. By sharing stories, they aim to demand accountability, challenge court secrecy, and push for reform.

Stories Into Storms: How Digital Advocacy is the Key to Fixing America’s Family Courts Read More