Tag: family court reform
Ada Accommodations / Anne Arundel County / Appellate Court / Baltimore City / Constitutional Law / Disability / Judges

A Voice for Justice: How Jeff Reichert Turned to an ADA Advocate to Defend His Rights and Protect His Son

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Jeff Reichert has engaged an independent ADA advocate, Janice Wolk Grenadier, to address alleged discrimination and procedural failures in his custody battle. Her letter calls for judicial accountability, an investigation into jurisdictional misconduct, enforcement of past court orders, and safeguarding the rights of both Grant and Jeff during a flawed legal process.

A Voice for Justice: How Jeff Reichert Turned to an ADA Advocate to Defend His Rights and Protect His Son Read More
Court Reform / Family Court / Judges / New York / The Fishman Files

Aidan Hasn’t Seen His Father in 7 Years: When Parental Alienation Is Court-Sanctioned

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Marc Fishman has not seen his son Aidan for over seven years, despite no allegations of abuse or danger. Fishman’s case highlights failures in the family court system, where parental alienation is overlooked and visitation rights are denied without due process. This tragedy reflects a broader issue affecting many parents and children.

Aidan Hasn’t Seen His Father in 7 Years: When Parental Alienation Is Court-Sanctioned Read More
Ada Accommodations / Advocacy / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court

Disabled, Defenseless, and Denied: How Family Courts Systematically Abuse Disabled Parents and Violate Federal Law

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Disabled parents in the U.S. face systemic discrimination in family courts, where their disabilities are used against them, often resulting in wrongful protective orders. The legal system ignores the ADA, leaving these parents vulnerable and alienated from their children. Accountability for judges is lacking, perpetuating this crisis. Immediate action and support are essential.

Disabled, Defenseless, and Denied: How Family Courts Systematically Abuse Disabled Parents and Violate Federal Law Read More
Uncategorized

The Pain of Helping: When Trauma Turns Kindness Into the Enemy

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The post reflects on the painful reality of losing friendships through acts of kindness. It highlights how trauma can distort perceptions of support, leading to accusations against those who genuinely want to help. The author emphasizes the importance of continuing to offer compassion despite experiencing backlash and the emotional toll that advocacy can take.

The Pain of Helping: When Trauma Turns Kindness Into the Enemy Read More
Adr / Advocacy / Constitutional Rights / Court Reform / Family Court / New York / The Fishman Files / Uncategorized

Paralyzed by Procedure: How Family Court Turns Technicalities Into Injustice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family court in New York often prioritizes procedural technicalities over truth, resulting in devastating consequences for parents like Marc Fishman, who struggles for access to his children due to bureaucratic failures. The system frequently dismisses claims based on flawed processes, not factual inaccuracies, highlighting an urgent need for reform to restore fair access to justice.

Paralyzed by Procedure: How Family Court Turns Technicalities Into Injustice Read More
Advocacy / Civil Rights / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Editorial / Family Court

The Family Court System Is Killing Us—And Nobody Cares

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family court in America is portrayed as a predatory system that inflicts trauma, fear, and injustice on loving parents. Many are silenced by the threat of losing custody, transforming the pursuit of truth into a dangerous endeavor. This crumbling system, masked as justice, demands public accountability to protect families and children.

The Family Court System Is Killing Us—And Nobody Cares Read More
Ada Accommodations / Adr / Constitutional Law / Court Reform / Family Court / Judges

The Lawless Bench: Judge Michelle Schauer’s Federal Rights Violations Against a Disabled Father Must Be Investigated

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

Westchester County Family Court Judge Michelle I. Schauer has unlawfully restricted disabled father Marc Fishman’s access to his twin sons’ school records, violating federal laws like FERPA and the ADA. This act reflects judicial overreach and potential discrimination, prompting calls for federal intervention and accountability for the judge and associated legal entities.

The Lawless Bench: Judge Michelle Schauer’s Federal Rights Violations Against a Disabled Father Must Be Investigated Read More
Family Court

Weaponizing Allegations: Why Governor Youngkin Must Address False Domestic Violence Claims in Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The article by Michael Phillips highlights the serious issue of false domestic violence allegations in Virginia’s family court, impacting many parents, particularly fathers. It discusses how these allegations are often used as manipulation tactics during custody battles, with dire consequences for the accused. The author calls for legal reforms to hold false accusers accountable.

Weaponizing Allegations: Why Governor Youngkin Must Address False Domestic Violence Claims in Family Court Read More
Constitutional Law

Don’t Be Fooled: Trump Got Exactly What He Wanted from the Supreme Court’s Deportation Decision

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

On May 16, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 against the deportation of Venezuelans with alleged gang ties, asserting the need for due process. This decision limits federal agencies’ discretionary power, aligning with Trump’s goal to curtail the administrative state and reinforce constitutional rights over bureaucratic authority.

Don’t Be Fooled: Trump Got Exactly What He Wanted from the Supreme Court’s Deportation Decision Read More
Adr / Family Court / Judges / New York / The Fishman Files / Uncategorized

When Judges Judge Their Own Cases: Why Recusal Rules Fail in Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In America’s family courts, the principle that no one should be a judge in their own case is often violated. The case of Marc Fishman highlights this issue, as Judge Michelle I. Schauer, with a contentious history with Fishman, asserts control over his custody case despite allegations of bias and ethical concerns, undermining judicial impartiality.

When Judges Judge Their Own Cases: Why Recusal Rules Fail in Family Court Read More