Home » Child Custody » Page 11

Could a ‘Three Strikes’ Law for Custody Interference Pass in Maryland or Virginia?

The Texas Senate passed Senate Bill 2794, enhancing penalties for repeated child custody interference, potentially categorizing the third offense as a felony. Discussion arises regarding the feasibility of similar laws in states like Maryland, with its progressive but lenient family court system, and Virginia, where bipartisan support for child protection is growing.

Could a ‘Three Strikes’ Law for Custody Interference Pass in Maryland or Virginia? Read More

Texas Senate Unanimously Passes SB 2794, Introducing ‘Three Strikes’ Law for Child Custody Interference

The Texas Senate passed SB 2794, enacting a “Three Strikes” policy against child custody interference, imposing escalating penalties for repeat offenders. The law aims to protect children and custodial parents, combat parental alienation, and strengthen family law enforcement. Its passage signifies a commitment to uphold court-ordered custody agreements.

Texas Senate Unanimously Passes SB 2794, Introducing ‘Three Strikes’ Law for Child Custody Interference Read More

“The Constitution Doesn’t Apply Here”: The Most Dangerous Lie in America’s Courtrooms

A New Jersey family court judge’s statement that “The Constitution doesn’t apply in my courtroom” reflects a broader issue in courts nationwide, especially in family law. The article argues that constitutional rights must be upheld across all judicial actions, insisting on accountability and condemning judicial tyranny in family courts where parental rights are violated.

“The Constitution Doesn’t Apply Here”: The Most Dangerous Lie in America’s Courtrooms Read More

The Constitution Is Not a Vibe: How Parham v. J.R. and Other Landmark Cases Expose the Lie at the Heart of Mahmoud v. Taylor

Mahmoud v. Taylor highlights a troubling trend in American family courts where fit parents’ rights are overridden based on vague “best interest” claims without proof of unfitness or harm. This undermines due process, as courts increasingly disregard constitutional protections for parental rights, leading to unjust custody decisions. Immediate reform is necessary.

The Constitution Is Not a Vibe: How Parham v. J.R. and Other Landmark Cases Expose the Lie at the Heart of Mahmoud v. Taylor Read More

Florida Launches First Office of Parental Rights — Will Maryland, Virginia, or D.C. Follow Its Lead?

Florida’s Attorney General James Uthmeier has launched the Office of Parental Rights (OPR), a pioneering initiative aimed at protecting and empowering parental rights. This agency will address violations related to schools and governmental entities. The OPR could inspire similar efforts nationwide, responding to growing concerns about family law and parental disenfranchisement.

Florida Launches First Office of Parental Rights — Will Maryland, Virginia, or D.C. Follow Its Lead? Read More

Family Court: The Administrative State That’s Destroying Families

America’s family courts have shifted from judicial proceedings to administrative enforcement, compromising due process and parental rights over the last thirty years. Critics highlight the system’s financial incentives and lack of transparency. Despite signs of resistance, meaningful reform faces challenges as families continue to suffer under obscure processes lacking true justice safeguards.

Family Court: The Administrative State That’s Destroying Families Read More

Post Malone’s Custody Battle: When Coachella Collides with the Courtroom

Post Malone faces a custody battle over his 2-year-old daughter with ex-fiancée Hee Sung “Jamie” Park, complicating his life just before a major performance. With conflicting petitions in California and Utah, the case highlights the challenges high-profile parents encounter in family court, where jurisdiction significantly affects custody and child support outcomes.

Post Malone’s Custody Battle: When Coachella Collides with the Courtroom Read More