The Protected Predator: How Lane Schlesinger Evaded Accountability for 15 Years

In New Rochelle, former police officer Lane Schlesinger exemplifies systemic misconduct, ignoring regulations during a COVID-19 incident and facing no accountability for numerous violations. Instead of discipline, he retired with a generous pension while individuals like Marc Fishman endure unjust consequences. This case highlights a troubling culture within police departments favoring protection over integrity.

The Protected Predator: How Lane Schlesinger Evaded Accountability for 15 Years Read More

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case

William Sewell, a South Carolina father, faces potential incarceration over unpaid child support and a hefty guardian ad litem fee. His case raises due process concerns, particularly regarding the right to legal counsel as outlined in Turner v. Rogers. This situation highlights systemic injustices towards indigent parents in family courts across the U.S.

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case Read More

Legal Malpractice, Immunity, and the Family Court Racket: The Untouchable Industry Destroying Families

The American legal system, particularly in family courts, has deteriorated into a profit-driven industry characterized by corruption, lack of accountability, and malpractice. Judges and attorneys often operate without consequences, perpetuating harm to families, especially fathers. Reform requires exposure and challenging corrupt practices, as true justice remains elusive in this system.

Legal Malpractice, Immunity, and the Family Court Racket: The Untouchable Industry Destroying Families Read More

Mechanic vs. Machine: How a South Carolina Family Court Is Destroying a Father With Legal Extortion

William H. Sewell, a South Carolina father, faces jail for inability to pay a $25,000 fee to a Guardian ad Litem, despite being deemed fit. Sewell’s custody case highlights systemic corruption, legal extortion, and a lack of accountability within family courts that crush economically disadvantaged parents. His story urges for reform and visibility.

Mechanic vs. Machine: How a South Carolina Family Court Is Destroying a Father With Legal Extortion Read More

Where Is the Oversight? NY Legislators Stay Silent as Family Court Abuses Continue

Marc Fishman, denied due process and access to his children, symbolizes systemic abuse in New York’s family courts, where judges act without accountability. Despite evidence of misconduct and legislators’ awareness, reforms remain unaddressed, resulting in suffering families. Immediate legislative action and oversight are essential to restore justice in the system.

Where Is the Oversight? NY Legislators Stay Silent as Family Court Abuses Continue Read More

A Voice for Justice: How Jeff Reichert Turned to an ADA Advocate to Defend His Rights and Protect His Son

Jeff Reichert has engaged an independent ADA advocate, Janice Wolk Grenadier, to address alleged discrimination and procedural failures in his custody battle. Her letter calls for judicial accountability, an investigation into jurisdictional misconduct, enforcement of past court orders, and safeguarding the rights of both Grant and Jeff during a flawed legal process.

A Voice for Justice: How Jeff Reichert Turned to an ADA Advocate to Defend His Rights and Protect His Son Read More

This Memorial Day, Let’s Remember All the Battles — Including the Ones Fought at Home

Memorial Day is a time to honor both fallen soldiers and veterans facing struggles within the family court system. Many veterans endure severe challenges, such as custody battles that exploit their mental health issues. Urgent reform is needed to ensure fair treatment, preserve their rights, and prevent the tragic loss of lives caused by these disputes.

This Memorial Day, Let’s Remember All the Battles — Including the Ones Fought at Home Read More

Guilty Without a Hearing: How New York Family Court Destroys Due Process

Marc Fishman’s experience in New York’s family court highlights a troubling reality where parents often face legal consequences without a trial. Default orders and procedural dismissals deny them their rights, with judges prioritizing bureaucracy over justice. This systemic issue calls for mandatory hearings to ensure due process and prevent unjust decisions regarding parental access.

Guilty Without a Hearing: How New York Family Court Destroys Due Process Read More

Justice by Omission: How Family Court Covers Up Its Failures

The family court system conceals its failures by omitting crucial data, perpetuating a false narrative of fairness and effectiveness. Critical metrics on custody rulings, false accusations, and parental alienation remain untracked, creating an environment resistant to accountability. Without transparency and independent oversight, systemic issues will persist, harming families unjustly.

Justice by Omission: How Family Court Covers Up Its Failures Read More

Buried by Design: What Is Maryland Family Court Hiding in the Reichert Case?

The Reichert v. Hornbeck custody case exposes systemic failures in Maryland courts that prevent Jeff Reichert from seeing his son, Grant, for over three years. Protective orders used against him appear to facilitate alienation, while concerns arise over the questionable circumstances surrounding Grant’s living arrangements and the mother’s history, raising suspicions of misconduct and abuse.

Buried by Design: What Is Maryland Family Court Hiding in the Reichert Case? Read More