Home » Topics » Family Court » Page 27

Stonewalled: How Law Enforcement and School Officials Are Trying to Bury What Happened on May 1 in San Marcos

I filed the records requests. I followed the law. And now I’m being stonewalled by the very agencies entrusted with the protection of children and the public’s trust. What happened …

Stonewalled: How Law Enforcement and School Officials Are Trying to Bury What Happened on May 1 in San Marcos Read More

The Lawless Bench: Judge Michelle Schauer’s Federal Rights Violations Against a Disabled Father Must Be Investigated

Westchester County Family Court Judge Michelle I. Schauer has unlawfully restricted disabled father Marc Fishman’s access to his twin sons’ school records, violating federal laws like FERPA and the ADA. This act reflects judicial overreach and potential discrimination, prompting calls for federal intervention and accountability for the judge and associated legal entities.

The Lawless Bench: Judge Michelle Schauer’s Federal Rights Violations Against a Disabled Father Must Be Investigated Read More

Weaponizing Allegations: Why Governor Youngkin Must Address False Domestic Violence Claims in Family Court

The article by Michael Phillips highlights the serious issue of false domestic violence allegations in Virginia’s family court, impacting many parents, particularly fathers. It discusses how these allegations are often used as manipulation tactics during custody battles, with dire consequences for the accused. The author calls for legal reforms to hold false accusers accountable.

Weaponizing Allegations: Why Governor Youngkin Must Address False Domestic Violence Claims in Family Court Read More

The Case Maryland Wants to Bury: Inside Reichert v. Hornbeck

The Reichert v. Hornbeck case details a father’s arduous battle for custody over his son, marked by systemic biases and legal obstacles. Jeff Reichert’s parental rights were revoked without appropriate justification, exacerbated by the Maryland judiciary’s refusal to publicly document critical rulings. This case highlights alarming issues within family law and judicial transparency.

The Case Maryland Wants to Bury: Inside Reichert v. Hornbeck Read More

The Survivorship Bias of Family Court: What We’re Missing Could Be What Matters Most

The content discusses survivorship bias in family court, highlighting how focus on positive outcomes obscures the experiences of those who do not succeed. It emphasizes the need for accountability and reform, urging for attention to the hidden failures and severe impacts on parents who are alienated or harmed by the system.

The Survivorship Bias of Family Court: What We’re Missing Could Be What Matters Most Read More

Judges with a Financial Stake in Your Case? Why That’s a Constitutional Crisis

The family court system faces significant issues regarding judicial impartiality, as many judges have financial ties that create conflicts of interest. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling in Caperton v. A.T. Massey, recusal is rarely practiced, leading to a constitutional crisis where litigants, particularly vulnerable ones, are deprived of fair hearings.

Judges with a Financial Stake in Your Case? Why That’s a Constitutional Crisis Read More

Governor Youngkin’s Veto of HB2613: Upholding Child Safety in Custody Decisions

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin vetoed House Bill 2613, which aimed to restrict courts from considering a parent’s legal substance use in custody cases. He expressed concerns about potential risks to child safety, particularly regarding access to cannabis products. The veto underscores that child welfare must remain paramount in custody decisions.

Governor Youngkin’s Veto of HB2613: Upholding Child Safety in Custody Decisions Read More

No Note-Taker, No Justice: How Family Court Denies ADA Rights

America’s family courts are violating the ADA by denying essential accommodations to disabled litigants like Marc Fishman, who faced obstacles accessing legal proceedings. This inconsistency represents a double standard compared to federal courts, undermining equal protection. Reform is crucial to ensure equitable access and accountability for family court judges regarding disability rights.

No Note-Taker, No Justice: How Family Court Denies ADA Rights Read More

Two Schools. Two Kids. No Court Order. Why I’m Investigating a Disturbing Attempted Child Removal in San Marcos.

On May 1, 2025, officials from various agencies attempted to remove Giselle Smiel’s children from school without legal authorization or notification. Despite no court order and no emergencies declared, this incident highlights serious violations of parental rights and due process. An investigation has been launched to uncover the circumstances behind this alarming event.

Two Schools. Two Kids. No Court Order. Why I’m Investigating a Disturbing Attempted Child Removal in San Marcos. Read More

When the Roles Reverse: Nikki Bella Ordered to Pay Ex-Husband Artem Chigvintsev in Rare Family Court Settlement

In a notable divorce settlement, Nikki Bella pays ex-husband Artem Chigvintsev $3,500 monthly in child support, plus a $200,000 lump sum. This case highlights a rare instance where a father receives substantial support, signaling potential shifts in family court dynamics toward fairness and shared responsibility for financially supporting families.

When the Roles Reverse: Nikki Bella Ordered to Pay Ex-Husband Artem Chigvintsev in Rare Family Court Settlement Read More