Home » Topics » Family Court » Page 2

Family Court
Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Trafficking / Child Welfare / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Federal Court / Maryland / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files

“I Don’t Recall”: Inside the Deposition That Could Unravel a Maryland Attorney’s Protective-Order Case

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

A recent deposition in the federal case Reichert v. Hornbeck is raising serious questions about the credibility of key accusations that once led to dozens of criminal charges against a father locked in a custody dispute.

During questioning, Sarah Hornbeck repeatedly stated she did not recall critical events surrounding those allegations—events that ultimately led to the plaintiff spending time in jail and facing years of litigation before the charges were dismissed.

Court filings indicate the accusations resulted in at least 26 criminal charges, all of which were later dropped or dismissed.

The pattern of memory gaps now sits at the center of a federal malicious prosecution lawsuit.

“I Don’t Recall”: Inside the Deposition That Could Unravel a Maryland Attorney’s Protective-Order Case Read More
Family Court / Federal Court / Judicial / Maryland / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files

The Reichert Files: What the Defendant Admitted Under Oath

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A February 2026 deposition in the federal case against Jeffrey Reichert revealed significant details about his contentious custody battle with Sarah Hornbeck. Hornbeck admitted her past DUI arrest and expressed memory gaps regarding critical events, raising questions about the reliability of her prior legal filings. The deposition highlights the complexities and ongoing nature of their legal conflict.

The Reichert Files: What the Defendant Admitted Under Oath Read More
Child Protective Services / Child Welfare / Government / Judicial / Laws / Legislation / Legislation / Ohio / State Lawmakers / State Legislators

Ohio GOP Pushes Child-Care Camera Mandate, Exposing Divide Over Fraud Oversight

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Ohio Republican lawmakers are advancing a proposal to mandate video cameras in publicly funded child-care centers to enhance oversight and protect taxpayer funds. Supporters argue it enables better accountability amidst fraud concerns, while critics highlight privacy issues and financial burdens on providers. The discussion reflects broader tensions around government surveillance and public funding.

Ohio GOP Pushes Child-Care Camera Mandate, Exposing Divide Over Fraud Oversight Read More
Domestic Policy / Domestic Policy / Family Court / Government / Justice & Governance

Indiana Weighs Using Opioid Settlement Funds for Family Court Counseling

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Vigo County, Indiana, a debate emerged over the use of opioid settlement funds for a Family Court counseling program aimed at aiding children and adults in divorce cases. Proponents advocate for early intervention to prevent future issues, while critics warn against diluting the funds’ original purpose, leading to cautious decision-making by officials.

Indiana Weighs Using Opioid Settlement Funds for Family Court Counseling Read More
Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Criminal / Family Court / Judicial / Protective Orders

California’s Criminal Courts Are Using Protective Orders to Hide Evidence — and No One Is Stopping Them

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

California’s criminal courts are increasingly using protective orders to restrict defendants’ access to evidence, undermining due process. Overwhelmed public defenders are forced to accept these orders, harming defendants’ rights to prepare their defense. This systemic issue risks wrongful convictions and highlights a need for reform to restore transparency and accountability in the legal system.

California’s Criminal Courts Are Using Protective Orders to Hide Evidence — and No One Is Stopping Them Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Welfare / Family Court / Foster Care

We Just Marked World Children’s Day — And Children’s Grief Awareness Day. America Failed Both.

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

World Children’s Day and Children’s Grief Awareness Day highlight the rights and emotional wounds of children. The 1959 Declaration underscores rights like family and protection, yet American systems often violate them, creating system-created grief. Children face trauma from separations and ineffective court processes. Urgent reforms are needed for healing and accountability.

We Just Marked World Children’s Day — And Children’s Grief Awareness Day. America Failed Both. Read More
Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Family Court / New York / New York Watch / The Fishman Files

Disability Advocates Condemn New York Court of Appeals and Judge Anthony Cannataro for Denying Disabled Father Access to Justice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The New York Court of Appeals dismissed Marc Fishman’s appeal regarding ADA violations during his seven-year litigation, claiming it lacked jurisdiction. Despite a federal judge’s order for accommodations, Westchester courts denied necessary support, highlighting systemic issues in New York’s justice system that prevent disabled litigants from obtaining fair treatment and redress. Advocates call for legislative reforms.

Disability Advocates Condemn New York Court of Appeals and Judge Anthony Cannataro for Denying Disabled Father Access to Justice Read More
Accountability / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Welfare / Executive / Executive Order / Family Court / Foster Care / Government

Melania Trump’s “Fostering the Future” Executive Order Signals a New Federal Push for Family Preservation and Accountability

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Melania Trump’s Executive Order, “Fostering the Future,” marks a transformative shift in U.S. child welfare policy, prioritizing family preservation over removals. It mandates transparency, accountability, and support for aging-out youth, while reopening pathways for faith-based organizations. This initiative recognizes the failures of the system and emphasizes the need for a family-oriented approach.

Melania Trump’s “Fostering the Future” Executive Order Signals a New Federal Push for Family Preservation and Accountability Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / Child Custody / Child Custody / Family Court / Mental Health

The Psychiatric Weapon: How Mental Health Was Turned into a Weapon of Control

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

California’s family courts exploit psychological diagnoses to control parents, monetizing their trauma under the guise of therapy. The interconnected system—comprising judges, evaluators, and therapists—creates dependencies that perpetuate conflict and financial burdens on families. Brenna Gano’s case exemplifies this abuse, revealing systemic failures and calls for urgent reform to protect vulnerable individuals.

The Psychiatric Weapon: How Mental Health Was Turned into a Weapon of Control Read More
Connecticut / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Misconduct / New York

From Custody to Conviction: The Nicholas Hall Case and the High Cost of Family-Court Weaponization

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Nicholas Hall, serving a 21-year prison sentence in Connecticut, was convicted amid a contentious custody battle. His supporters claim the charges stemmed from manipulative tactics by his ex-wife, supported by politically connected families. Advocates argue for systemic reforms to ensure fair trials and broaden access to critical evidence, emphasizing injustices in family-court linked prosecutions.

From Custody to Conviction: The Nicholas Hall Case and the High Cost of Family-Court Weaponization Read More