Home » Due Process » Page 7

The ADA Black Hole: How Judges Pretend Disability Rights Don’t Exist in America’s Courtrooms

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is often disregarded in U.S. courts, resulting in severe consequences for disabled litigants like Marc Fishman and Taran Nolan. Courts frequently deny or ignore ADA accommodations, causing emotional and legal chaos. This systemic issue necessitates enforcement, training, and accountability for judges to ensure equal justice.

The ADA Black Hole: How Judges Pretend Disability Rights Don’t Exist in America’s Courtrooms Read More

You Have the Right to Remain Silent—Yes, Even in Family Court

Miranda Rights extend beyond criminal arrests to family court, which can threaten personal liberty and finances. Individuals facing inquiries about finances may invoke the Fifth Amendment to protect against self-incrimination. With no constitutional safeguards, understanding one’s rights in family court is essential, as the implications can be severe and life-altering.

You Have the Right to Remain Silent—Yes, Even in Family Court Read More

The Business of Broken Families: How Corporations Profit from Child Support Enforcement

The child support enforcement system, often seen as protective, is critiqued for being a profit-driven network. It utilizes administrative measures bypassing judicial oversight, leading to punitive actions against struggling parents. This system, enriched by corporate contractors, harms families, particularly fathers, while demanding reform for transparency and due process.

The Business of Broken Families: How Corporations Profit from Child Support Enforcement Read More

Innocent Until Family Court: How Due Process Dies Behind Closed Doors

Family court in the U.S. operates differently from criminal courts, lacking essential rights like the presumption of innocence and a jury. False allegations are common, leading to unjust outcomes. The burden of proof lies with the accused, and mental health issues are weaponized against parents. Reforms are urgently needed to ensure fairness and due process.

Innocent Until Family Court: How Due Process Dies Behind Closed Doors Read More

Weaponized Safety? How Illinois Protective Orders Are Reshaping Child Custody—Before Trial Even Begins

A recent article highlights the controversial use of emergency orders of protection (EOPs) in Illinois family courts, where allegations of abuse can lead to immediate and significant custody changes without the accused’s presence. Critics argue this process undermines due process and allows for abuse of the system, especially affecting fathers’ rights. Advocates call for reforms to ensure fairer handling of such orders.

Weaponized Safety? How Illinois Protective Orders Are Reshaping Child Custody—Before Trial Even Begins Read More

Government Overreach or Necessary Action? 88 Children Seized from Iowa Faith-Based Camp with Few Answers Given

In Louisa County, Iowa, 88 children from a Christian summer camp were taken into protective custody, raising concerns about due process and government transparency. The lack of specific charges or evidence of abuse has alarmed the community, prompting calls for accountability and investigation into the motivations behind this mass removal.

Government Overreach or Necessary Action? 88 Children Seized from Iowa Faith-Based Camp with Few Answers Given Read More

Democrats Outraged Over One Arrest — But Where Was Their Outrage for the Rest of Us?

The arrest of Senator Alex Padilla during a protest has sparked outrage among Democrats, with Representative Jamie Raskin condemning it as authoritarian. However, Maryland veteran Jeff Reichert highlights hypocrisy, recalling his own wrongful arrests amid silence from the party. He emphasizes that justice should apply universally, not just for political gain.

Democrats Outraged Over One Arrest — But Where Was Their Outrage for the Rest of Us? Read More

The Last Minute Drop-Off: Sabotage, Silence, and a Father’s Restraint

William Sewell faces a tumultuous custody battle, with recent events compounding an ongoing struggle against obstruction from his ex-wife, Leslie. Despite being denied visitation and receiving a sudden handoff of his daughter Dema, William remains committed and documents everything while preparing for court. He plans to file a Motion for Contempt to address Leslie’s manipulative behavior and ensure a stable co-parenting arrangement.

The Last Minute Drop-Off: Sabotage, Silence, and a Father’s Restraint Read More

No Counsel, No Help, No Justice: What Happens When the Family Court System Targets the Poor

William Sewell’s story highlights systemic failures in family courts that disadvantage poor parents. Denied legal aid and faced with ineffective representation, he experienced retaliation when seeking help. This reflects a broader issue where low-income individuals are punished for asserting their rights, revealing a need for significant reforms in the legal system.

No Counsel, No Help, No Justice: What Happens When the Family Court System Targets the Poor Read More

Is It Ever Legal to Let a Child Drink? In Family Court, the Answer Depends on Who You Are.

William Sewell alleges that family court in South Carolina ignored credible evidence of his ex-wife allowing their young daughter to sip alcoholic drinks, while he faces contempt charges. This highlights systemic bias in family courts, where mothers’ behavior is often overlooked and fathers are unfairly scrutinized, undermining child safety and trust in the legal system.

Is It Ever Legal to Let a Child Drink? In Family Court, the Answer Depends on Who You Are. Read More