It didn’t take long for Dr. Adejare “Jay” Atanda — senior policy researcher at RAND Corporation, public health expert, and self-proclaimed defender of democracy — to respond to my critique. But instead of addressing the issue at hand (his petty criticism of a disabled independent journalist using AI imagery), his reply was a flood of insults, smears, and identity politics.
Let’s break it down.
The Deflection Tactic: Shout “Racism” Loud Enough, Hope Nobody Asks Questions
Dr. Atanda’s first move was to accuse me of “casual racism” — a vague charge with no evidence attached. This is a classic strategy: when you can’t defend your own elitist behavior, you smear your critic as a racist, hoping it sticks. It’s lazy, and it’s dangerous.
Coming from a man who sits at the RAND Corporation — a taxpayer-backed think tank that has advised on everything from nuclear weapons to surveillance policy — it’s even more reckless. If a senior policy researcher believes disagreement equals “KKK journalism,” that says more about his insecurity than about my reporting.
The Ad Hominem Barrage
Rather than addressing my arguments, Dr. Atanda went straight to character assassination. He accused me of being:
- “Jobless, miserable, deadbeat”
- “Can’t hold down a job, can’t keep a woman, can’t keep a kid”
- “Poor physical shape, shitty mental health”
- “Cosplaying as an investigative journalist”
That’s not policy critique. That’s not intellectual debate. That’s the language of Twitter trolls, not senior policy researchers trusted with U.S. biosecurity.
It’s also ironic: he accuses me of hiding behind “multiple usernames” while he hides behind his RAND credentials and his identity to deflect accountability for his behavior.
The Ivory Tower Hypocrisy
This is the crux of it: Atanda’s professional persona is built on seriousness. He publishes in Nature. He briefs on AI misuse and pandemic response. He sits on commissions and boards. He frames himself as a responsible steward of emerging technologies.
And yet, online, he’s calling people “jobless deadbeats” and comparing a journalist’s article to the KKK. The contrast is stunning. Imagine if any independent journalist called a Black RAND researcher a “KKK wannabe” — it would be front-page outrage. But when Atanda does it, it’s just another Tuesday.
The Bigger Picture
This isn’t about me. It’s about power.
When elites like Dr. Atanda attack independent journalists with racial smears and character assassination, they’re sending a message: don’t challenge us. Stay in your lane. Accept that only credentialed experts can speak about AI, technology, or politics.
But the truth is, AI tools are democratizing journalism. They allow disabled, underfunded, and independent writers like me to compete. And that’s exactly why elitists feel threatened.
Because for all the degrees and fellowships in the world, what really terrifies them is the idea that an outsider — someone without their pedigree — might challenge their narrative.
Discover more from RIPTIDE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
