Home » Blog » Baltimore’s DEI Boondoggle: $2.7 Million for Ideology While the City Burns

Baltimore’s DEI Boondoggle: $2.7 Million for Ideology While the City Burns

Spotlight on Maryland – Fiscal Irresponsibility, One Identity Group at a Time
🔗 Original Budget Report


While Baltimore bleeds both population and purpose, the city’s leadership appears to have found a shiny new hill to die on: identity-based bureaucracy. Mayor Brandon Scott’s newly proposed FY2026 budget would allocate $2.7 million to fund stand-alone offices for Immigrant and Multicultural Affairs, African American Male Engagement, and LGBTQ Affairs—all under the umbrella of “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” (DEI). This would be laughable if it weren’t taking place against the backdrop of an $85 million budget deficit and a city plagued by rampant crime, crumbling infrastructure, and chronically failing schools.

It’s worth asking: where is the office for disabled Baltimoreans who can’t access buildings, services, or courtrooms? Where is the office for fathers and mothers erased by a corrupt and discriminatory family court system? Where is the office for working-class residents who just want safe streets, working sewers, and schools that teach reading instead of ideology?

Mayor Scott’s DEI fantasy is the latest chapter in Baltimore’s misguided obsession with performative politics. Instead of investing in services that impact all citizens equally—such as better mental health services, transportation, affordable housing, or even basic ADA compliance—the administration is carving the city up into ever-narrower political silos.

DEI or DIE (Deficit-Induced Extinction)?

Here’s a question that’s being ignored: How does pouring millions into ideological offices help the average Baltimore family? These DEI offices sound great on a press release or campaign poster, but offer little in terms of measurable outcomes or return on investment.

  • $2.7 million could pay for more EMTs or mental health crisis responders.
  • It could fund legal support services for disabled individuals denied court accommodations.
  • It could be used to support trauma-impacted children in a city that sees over 300 homicides a year.
  • Or—God forbid—it could be used to examine and fix Maryland’s family court system, which regularly severs parents from their children without cause or due process.

But that would require confronting systems of real abuse—not just symbolic ones. And confronting that would require Mayor Scott and the City Council to stop playing favorites with identity checklists and start serving the entire city.

Ignoring the Real Marginalized

In today’s Baltimore, if you’re a working-class parent, disabled veteran, wrongfully alienated father, or abuse survivor trying to navigate the family court maze, you don’t get a taxpayer-funded office or six-figure advocates lobbying on your behalf. You get ignored—or worse, you get vilified for not fitting into the politically correct categories that this administration deems worthy of “equity.”

The DEI offices aren’t solving Baltimore’s core problems—they’re distracting from them.

A Budget Built on Division

A city that prioritizes bureaucratic identity warfare over public safety, core services, and constitutional rights doesn’t need new offices. It needs new leadership.

Baltimore’s future depends not on how many DEI offices it can staff, but on whether it can restore trust, repair broken systems, and treat all citizens—not just some—as worthy of dignity, support, and equal protection under the law.

Until then, it’s DEI for some, and the short end of the stick for everyone else.


Discover more from RIPTIDE

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Michael Phillips's avatar

About Michael Phillips

Michael Phillips is a journalist, editor, creator, IT consultant, and father. He writes about politics, family-court reform, and civil rights.

View all posts by Michael Phillips →

Leave a Reply